How will we pay? Projective fictions and regimes of foresight in US college finance

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2226232
AutoresCaitlin Zaloom (0000-0001-6285-7171, New York University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2018
Volumen8
Número1-2
Páginas239-251
Fecha de publicación2018-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaHau Journal of Ethnographic Theory (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2049-1115 • E-ISSN: 2575-1433
EditorialUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/698220
OpenAlexW2809399089
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas10
Referencias citadas32

For most American households today, a college education requires financial planning. Planning can seem like a reckoning with "real" economic constraints of household budgetary truths; however, financial planning begins with imaginative acts. To plan, families must craft "projective fictions," forecasts of trends in the broader economy and family life with which they can guide parenting actions in the present. Drawing on inspiration from ethnographic interviews with more than 160 middle-class college students and their families, this essay examines government policy and financial industry agendas that have linked planning practices with familial virtue. A contrast between two "regimes of foresight" and their moralities-the mid-century US policies' regime of "near-term prudence" and the contemporary regime of "distant modeling"-exposes the work "real economy" accomplishes: the policies and instruments of planning produce and distribute virtue as much as financial outcomes

Craft · Economics · Estate planning · Financial plan · Futures contract · Futures studies · Government (linguistics · Pension · Political science · Prudence · Sociology · Virtue · History · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Work-Family Balance Challenges · Finance