Social–Ecological Systems
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22368481 |
|---|---|
| Autores | J S Lansing (0000-0003-2132-5309, Santa Fe Institute), Thérèse De Vet (University of Arizona) |
| Año | 2018 |
| Páginas | 1-4 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2018-09-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | OTHER |
| Revista | The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2110 |
| OpenAlex | W3081737252 |
| ISBN | 9781118924396 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 5 |
Anthropology's engagement with ecology, unique in the social sciences, has a long history. In 1903, Durkheim and Mauss argued that the relationship between nature (macrocosm) and culture (microcosm) is the primordial foundation for both human cognition and social organization. Cultural ecologists later added an ecological dimension to this perspective, linking sociological theory to community ecology. More recently, the concept of an “Anthropocene” era has intensified interest in humanity's relationship to the natural world. The concept of social–ecological systems implicitly suggests that the relationship between them is more complex than simple exploitation of the earth's resources. But there is as yet no consensus as to how this relationship should be approached as a scientific question
Anthropocene · Biology · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Geography · Humanity · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Anthropology · Environmental Philosophy and Ethics · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · Philosophy · Ecology
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |