Communication as an Entrepreneurial Capability in STEM Higher Education
Theory and Pedagogical Practice
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22413611 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Louise Kuchel (0000-0003-1737-0203, The University of Queensland, autor de correspondencia), Susan Rowland (0000-0002-7052-3451, The University of Sydney) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-05-06 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Research in Science Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0157-244X • E-ISSN: 1573-1898 |
| Editorial | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11165-026-10340-x |
| OpenAlex | W7160392873 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 44 |
Entrepreneurial education is emerging as valuable within STEM higher education, but a lack of clarity around the specific range of skills, behaviours and attributes that help develop entrepreneurial capability in students makes it difficult to identify how best to teach and assess it. In this article, we argue for communication practices to be core learning in development of entrepreneurial capability and highlight the synergies with existing practices in STEM higher education. We provide a theoretical rationale to support our argument and demonstrate that communication needs to be conceptualised as more than the classic outputs routinely assessed in science programs to foster entrepreneurial capability in STEM students. Drawing on a body of work by science communicator-educators on how to teach university science students to communicate (Rowland & Kuchel, 2023), we map categories of communication practice used in STEM against the functional entrepreneurial activities and characteristics provided by Filion (2011). Our results show strong alignment between the two, thus providing practical support for communication as foundational to entrepreneurial capability in STEM education. The communication practices of ‘investigating’, ‘engaging an audience’, and ‘joining the conversation’ most frequently underpin Filion’s entrepreneurial actions. Based on these findings we provide a menu of actionable, high impact pedagogies and example learning activities for teaching practitioners in higher education, distilled from relevant lesson plans in Rowland & Kuchel (2023), that can be delivered and assessed in formal education settings as foundational to entrepreneurial learning for STEM students.
Best practice · CLARITY · Entrepreneurship · Higher education · Science education · Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies · Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
The impact of entrepreneurship education on the entrepreneurial intention of students in science and engineering versus business studies university programs
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Bridging the Research Gap—A Framework for Assessing Entrepreneurial Competencies Based on Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy
Co-creative pedagogies
How does assessment drive learning? A focus on students’ development of evaluative judgement
Teaching communication in general science degrees
High-impact teaching practices in higher education
Evaluating Collaboration for Effectiveness
Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment
Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis
| Altamente citado | No |
|---|