Unlearning modernity
Remaking science education in the Anthropocene
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22436033 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Megan Hurley (0000-0002-7875-0798, Trinity College Dublin, autor de correspondencia), Marianne Achiam (0000-0003-1701-2959), M P Achiam (University of Copenhagen, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Volumen | 13 |
| Número | 1 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-07-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992 |
| Editorial | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/s41599-026-08221-9 |
| OpenAlex | W7168130609 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 44 |
Across select frontiers of the disciplines, contemporary science is beginning to reorient toward relationality, uncertainty and intelligences beyond the human. In fields such as holobiont biology and quantum science and in practices ranging from animal-technology collaboration to anticolonial research, emerging scientific work demonstrates the viability of a world viewed as entangled, co-constituted and not fully knowable from a detached vantage point. Yet, science education, even when positioned as a response to the challenges of the Anthropocene, remains anchored in the modernist logics of control, separability and human exceptionalism that have exacerbated the polycrisis. This misalignment is structural, rooted in science education’s inheritance of a modernist framework that emerging science seems to be gradually abandoning. Drawing on these developing practices, this Comment suggests that the boundaries of legitimate scientific knowledge can be expanded toward relationality, uncertainty, and intelligences beyond the human, and that science education has a responsibility to engage with these shifts. We propose that collectively unlearning the habits and mindsets that are no longer fit for purpose is a crucial step toward a renewed rigour in science education. This challenges the dominant model of science education as a pipeline from disciplinary knowledge to technological progress to economic growth, and establishes the case for a fundamental reorientation: from training problem-solvers to cultivating participants in knowledge generation, world-building and the shared stewardship of planetary futures.
Anthropocene · Environmental education · Science education · Traditional knowledge · Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature · Indigenous and Place-Based Education · Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Epistemic Injustice
The Thinking of Dissensus
Dinosaurs and white elephants
Toward Just and Sustainable Futures
Inviting Conversations in Discipline‐Based Science Education
The trouble with STEAM and why we use it anyway
Post-normal science communication? Evidence of third-order thinking among sustainability scientists
Why We Teach Science (and Why We Should)
Reimagining Science Education in the Anthropocene
Dark Pedagogy
Pedagogy in the Anthropocene
Hybridizing sustainability
Redefining co-design for social-ecological research and practice
The End of the Cognitive Empire
Discovering earth and the missing masses—technologically informed education for a post-sustainable future
Thinking with Nature
Citizen Science Terminology Matters
Science and Colonial Expansion
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |