Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Co-production in community mental health services

Blurred Boundaries or a Game of Pretend

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2249381
AutoresSine Kirkegaard (0000-0003-0191-1001, Department of People and Technology Roskilde University Roskilde Denmark, autor de correspondencia), Ditte Andersen (0000-0002-2085-3305, VIVE ‐ The Danish Center for Social Science Research Copenhagen Denmark)
Año2018
Volumen40
Número5
Páginas828-842
Fecha de publicación2018-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSociology of Health & Illness (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0141-9889 • E-ISSN: 1467-9566
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1467-9566.12722
PMID29479721
OpenAlexW2789453356
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas23
Referencias citadas54

The concept of co-production suggests a collaborative production of public welfare services, across boundaries of participant categories, for example professionals, service users, peer-workers and volunteers. While co-production has been embraced in most European countries, the way in which it is translated into everyday practice remains understudied. Drawing on ethnographic data from Danish community mental health services, we attempt to fill this gap by critically investigating how participants interact in an organisational set-up with blurred boundaries between participant categories. In particular, we clarify under what circumstances the blurred boundaries emerge as believable. Theoretically, we combine Lamont and Molnár's (2002) distinction between symbolic boundaries and social boundaries with Goffman's (1974) microanalysis of 'principles of convincingness'. The article presents three findings: (1) co-production is employed as a symbolic resource for blurring social boundaries; (2) the believability of blurred boundaries is worked up through participants' access to resources of validation, knowledge and authority; and (3) incongruence between symbolic and social boundaries institutionalises practices where participants merely act 'as if' boundaries are blurred. Clarification of the principles of convincingness contributes to a general discussion of how co-production frames the everyday negotiation of symbolic and social boundaries in public welfare services

Business · Economics · Mental health · Microeconomics · Production (economics · Psychiatry · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology

  • Co-Producing Sustainability

    Open Access•Carina Wyborn, Amber Datta et al.•Annual Review of Environment and…•2019

  • Balancing power in co-production

    Open Access•Caroline Ärleskog, Nicoline Vackerberg et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2021

  • Co-Production of Care During Covid-19

    Open Access•Ditte Andersen, Sine Kirkegaard et al.•Contexts•2020

  • The politics of insufficiency

    Morten Frederiksen, Ane Grubb•Public Management Review•2023

  • ‘I do not want to be one of her favourites’. Emotional display and the co-production of frontline care services

    Open Access•Nanna Møller Mortensen, Claudia Needham•Public Management Review•2023

  • Les pratiques citoyennes de sensibilisation communautaire coproduites durant la pandémie et les tensions liées à leur pérennisation

    Open Access•Isabelle Ruelland, Léa Coget•Nouvelles pratiques sociales•2024

  • Research Co-production Within Humanitarian Health

    Open Access•Michelle Lokot, Thurayya Zreik•International Review of…•2025

  • Community-led Work and Its Impact on Deprofessionalization

    Open Access•Jenny Nilsson•Professions and Professionalism•2020

  • Co-production in mental health care, research, and education

    Open Access•Dagim Dawit Gonsamo, Herman Hay Ming Lo et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2026

  • The politics of co-production

    Open Access•Esther Turnhout, Tamara Metze et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2019

  • Citizens as Active Participants in Integrated Care

    Open Access•Ludo Glimmerveen, Henk Nies et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • The complexities of developing equal relationships in patient and public involvement in health research

    Open Access•Caroline Pearce•Social Theory & Health•2020

  • On solidarity and volunteering during the Covid-19 crisis in Denmark

    Open Access•Hjalmar Bang Carlsen, Jonas Toubøl et al.•European Societies•2020

  • Loops and Building Blocks

    Open Access•Camilla Audia, Frans Berkhout et al.•Journal of Urban Health•2021

  • Toward a New Typology of Professional and Voluntary Care

    Open Access•Anders La Cour•Voluntas Revista Internacional de…•2022

  • Co‐production in the epidemiological clinic

    Open Access•Nicola Gale, Patrick Brown et al.•Social Policy and Administration•2019

  • Ethnography of User Involvement

    Open Access•M L Kessing, Sine Kirkegaard•Qualitative Health Research•2025

  • Countervailing powers in the labor room

    Open Access•Crystal Adams, Mica Curtin-Bowen•Social Science & Medicine•2021

  • The boundary-work of volunteering and the value of unwaged work in the dual crisis of care

    Open Access•Emilia Dowling•The Sociological Review•2024

  • Disembodied care

    Open Access•Anna Samén, Jens Lindberg et al.•Nordic Journal of Social Research•2024

  • Feeling or Funding? Critical Coproduction, Rationality, Emotionality, and Axiological Reflections

    Open Access•M Hiemstra, Christopher R Matthews•Qualitative Inquiry•2025

  • Experiential knowledge in mental health services

    Open Access•Sine Kirkegaard•Sociology of Health & Illness•2022

  • It is a different world in here

    Open Access•M L Kessing•Sociology of Health & Illness•2020

  • Governing the Commons

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Governing the Commons•1990

  • Analyzing Narrative Reality

    Jaber Gubrium, Jaber F Gubrium et al.•Analyzing Narrative Reality•2009

  • The Multiple Facets of Co-Production

    Jonathan Alford, John Alford•Public Management Review•2014

  • Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production

    Victor Pestoff•Public Management Review•2014

  • Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services

    Stephen P Osborne, Zoe Radnor et al.•Public Management Review•2016

  • A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production

    W H Voorberg, V J J M Bekkers et al.•Public Management Review•2015

  • Reimagining the Human Service Relationship

    Per Korean Solvang, Per Koren Solvang et al.•Reimagining the Human Service…•2016

  • Claiming Power in Doctor–Patient Talk

    Nancy Ainsworth‐vaughn, Nancy Ainsworth-Vaughn•Claiming power in doctor-patient…•1998

  • Social theory and the politics of identity

    Craig Calhoun, Craig J Calhoun•Social theory and the politics of…•1994

  • The Will to Empower

    Barbara Cruikshank•The Will to Empower•1999

  • Not Just an Individual Journey

    Open Access•Alain Topor, Marit Borg et al.•International Journal of Social…•2011

  • ‘Building up safe havens…all around the world’

    Open Access•Vanessa Pinfold•Health & Place•2000

  • Can the lunatics actually take over the asylum

    Open Access•Jon E Zibbell, Jon Zibbell•International Journal of Drug…•2004

  • On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor/patient interaction

    Open Access•Alison Pilnick, Robert Dingwall•Social Science & Medicine•2011

  • Sociology of diagnosis

    Open Access•Annemarie Jutel•Sociology of Health & Illness•2009

  • Generating ‘good enough’ evidenc for co-production

    Open Access•Catherine Durose, Claudia Needham et al.•Evidence & Policy•2015

  • Realising the Potential of Co-production

    Open Access•Claudia Needham•Social Policy and Society•2008

  • Beyond the counter-narrative

    Alexandra L Adame, Roger M Knudson•Narrative Inquiry•2007

  • Freedom as self-transgression

    K Villadsen•European Journal of Social Work•2008

  • An Ambiguous Concept

    Open Access•Benjamin Ewert, Adalbert Evers•Voluntas Revista Internacional de…•2012

  • Co-production

    Open Access•Bram Verschuere, Taco Brandsen et al.•Voluntas Revista Internacional de…•2012

  • Towards Developing New Partnerships in Public Services

    Open Access•Marianna Fotaki•Public Administration•2010

  • Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Second Edition

    Robert M Emerson, Rachel I Fretz et al.•Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes•2011

  • Erving Goffman

    Richard Jenkins•Journal of Power•2008

  • Beyond Engagement and Participation

    Open Access•T Bovaird•Public Administration Review•2007

  • Crossing the great divide

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•World Development•1996

  • The Interaction Order

    Erving Goffman•American Sociological Review•1983

  • Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science

    Thomas F Gieryn•American Sociological Review•1983

  • Realising the transformative potential of healthcare partnerships

    Open Access•Emma-Louise Aveling, Graham P Martins et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2013

  • Patients or partners? Case studies of user involvement in the planning and delivery of adult mental health services in London

    Open Access•Deborah Rutter, Cole Manley et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2004

  • Tracing the roots of social citizenship

    K Villadsen, B Turner et al.•Citizenship Studies•2016

  • Cultivating Differences

    Anne Bowler, M Lamont et al.•Social Forces•1996

  • Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research

    Open Access•Bent Flyvbjerg•Qualitative Inquiry•2006

  • Categorization

    Open Access•Richard Jenkins•Current Sociology•2000

  • The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences

    M Lamont, Molnar et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•2002

  • Patients as team members

    Open Access•Graham P Martins, Graham P Martin et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2011

  • Wellbeing and empowerment

    Open Access•Pamela Fisher•Sociology of Health & Illness•2008

  • The rise of surveillance medicine

    Open Access•David Armstrong•Sociology of Health & Illness•1995

  • A 'movement for improvement'? A qualitative study of the adoption of social movement strategies in the implementation of a quality improvement campaign

    Open Access•J Waring, Amanda Crompton•Sociology of Health & Illness•2017

  • Divided care and the Third Way

    Open Access•Jonathan Tritter, J Q Tritter et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2003

  • Community participation and citizenship in British health care planning

    Open Access•Timothy Milewa, Justin Valentine et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•1999

  • Manifesto for a Relational Sociology

    Mustafa Emirbayer•American Journal of Sociology•1997

  • The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government

    Nikolas Rose•Economy and Society•1996

  • Between Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman

    Ian Hacking•Economy and Society•2004

  • Rethinking ethnicity

    Richard Jenkins•Ethnic and Racial Studies•1994

  • Boundary Work and Exchange

    Open Access•Sida Liu•Symbolic Interaction•2015

  • Giving Clients a Backstage Experience

    Open Access•Ditte Andersen•Symbolic Interaction•2014

Obras citantes distintas23
Citas por año3,29
Intervalo de citas2019 - 2026 (8)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 23
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae