Genomic expertise in action
Molecular Tumour Boards and Decision-Making in Precision Oncology
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2249606 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Pascale Bourret (0000-0001-7294-7461, Aix‐Marseille Univ INSERM IRD SESSTIM Institut Paoli‐Calmettes Marseille France, autor de correspondencia), Alberto Cambrosio (0000-0001-5922-0137, Department of Social Studies of Medicine McGill University Montreal QC Canada) |
| Año | 2019 |
| Volumen | 41 |
| Número | 8 |
| Páginas | 1568-1584 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2019-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Sociology of Health & Illness (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0141-9889 • E-ISSN: 1467-9566 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9566.12970 |
| PMID | 31197873 |
| OpenAlex | W2950979161 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 22 |
| Referencias citadas | 37 |
The recent development of cancer precision medicine is associated with the emergence of 'molecular tumour boards' (MTBs). Attended by a heterogenous set of practitioners, MTBs link genomic platforms to clinical practices by establishing 'actionable' connections between drugs and molecular alterations. Their activities rely on a number of evidential resources - for example databases, clinical trial results, basic knowledge about mutations and pathways - that need to be associated with the clinical trajectory of individual patients. Experts from various domains are required to master and align diverse kinds of information. However, rather than examining MTBs as an institution interfacing different kinds of expertise embedded in individual experts, we argue that expertise is the emergent outcome of MTBs, which can be conceptualised as networks or 'agencements' of humans and devices. Based on the ethnographic analysis of the activities of four clinical trial MTBs (three in France and an international one) and of two French routine-care MTBs, the paper analyses how MTBs produce therapeutic decisions, centring on the new kind of expertise they engender. The development and activities of MTBs signal a profound transformation of the evidentiary basis and processes upon which biomedical expertise and decision-making in oncology are predicated and, in particular, the emergence of a clinic of variants
Action (physics · Bioinformatics · Biology · Clinical trial · Computational biology · Data science · Gene · Genomic information · Interfacing · Molecular diagnostics · Pathology · Precision medicine · Precision oncology · Set (abstract data type · Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics · Computer Science · Genetic factors in colorectal cancer · Genetics · Genomics and Rare Diseases · Internal Medicine · Medicine
Ontological deskilling
Navigating the uncertainties of next‐generation sequencing in the genetics clinic
Epistemic dwelling
Beyond nosology? Molecular tumor boards, singularization, and the conflation of diagnosis and therapy
Data curation-research
Beyond full jurisdiction
Past-futures in experimental care
Sorting out and navigating uncertainty in precision medicine
Histology agnosticism
Concepts of Actionability in Precision Oncology
Game-changing? When Biomarker Discovery and Novel Forms of Patient Work Meet
The highest decision-making level” – Multidisciplinary team meetings as boundary spaces
A precision immuno-oncology turn? Hybridizing cancer genomics and immunotherapy through neoantigens-based adoptive cell therapies
Caring for Organoids
Organizing precision medicine
Actionable data for precision oncology
Brains exposed
The genomic promise of cancer as "not-yet-treatable" and the moral burden of "trying
Reconfiguration of uncertainty
The Role of Algorithms in Molecular Tumour Boards-Managing the Gap Between Research and Clinic in Precision Medicine
Precision patients
A sociology of precision-in-practice
Image and Logic
Studies in ethnomethodology
Assemblage Theory
Narrating uncertainty
How the genome got a life span
Extending experimentation
On being “actionable”
Informing materials
Ad hoc special section on ethnomethodological studies of science, mathematics, and technical activity
Staging and Weighting Evidence in Biomedicine
Testing devices or experimental systems? Cancer clinical trials take the genomic turn
One more chemo or one too many? Defining the limits of treatment and innovation in medical oncology
Dits et écrits, 1954-1988, Tome III
La force des dispositifs
Theory Construction in Qualitative Research
Practices of reading and writing
For a Sociology of Expertise
| Obras citantes distintas | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3,67 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 22 |