Interpersonal Deception
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2269738 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Judee K Burgoon (0000-0002-5524-3734, University of Arizona), David B Buller (0000-0001-7902-9129, University of Arizona), Leesa Dillman (University of Nevada, Las Vegas), Joseph B Walther (0000-0003-2393-9208) |
| Año | 1995 |
| Volumen | 22 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 163-196 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1995-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Human Communication Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0360-3989 • E-ISSN: 1468-2958 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00365.x |
| OpenAlex | W2998390340 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 21 |
| Referencias citadas | 29 |
Interpersonal deception theory (IDT) frames deception as a communication activity and examines deception within interactive contexts. One key element of the theory is the role of suspicion in prompting behavior changes. An experiment testing several suspicion-related hypotheses paired participants (half friends, half strangers) for interviews during which interviewees (EEs) lied or told the truth and interviewers (ERs) were induced to be (moderately or highly) suspicious (or not). Results confirmed that suspicion and deceit were perceived when present, suspicion was manifested through nonverbal behaviors but with different behavioral patterns for moderately versus highly suspicious ERs, and suspicion affected sender behavior. Relational familiarity moderated some behaviors. Results are discussed in terms of mutual influence processes and the dynamic nature of communication in interpersonal deception
Communication source · Deception · Developmental psychology · Interpersonal communication · Interpersonal interaction · Interpersonal relationship · Nonverbal communication · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending · Social Psychology · Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Scientific jury selection.
Computer-Mediated Communication
A Fresh View of the Veracity Effect in Deception Research
Self-Generated Versus Other-Generated Statements and Impressions in Computer-Mediated Communication
Mindfulness and Interpersonal Communication
Linguistic Styles in Deceptive Communication
Interpersonal Deception Theory
Testing Interpersonal Deception Theory
Testing Interpersonal Deception Theory
Accuracy in detecting truths and lies
Interpersonal deception
How people really detect lies
Base Rates, Deception Detection, and Deception Theory
His Lips Are Moving
On Lying and Being Lied To
Evidence for the Pinocchio Effect
Behavioral Adaptation in Deceptive Transactions Fact or Fiction
Does Participation Affect Deception Success? A Test of the Interactivity Principle
A Communication Researchers' Guide to Null Hypothesis Significance Testing and Alternatives
Does Participation Affect Deception Success
Can Behavioral Adaptation Explain the Probing Effect? Rejoinder to Buller et al
Interpersonal Adaptation
Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception †
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life
Handbook of Interpersonal Communication
Interpersonal Deception Theory
Interpersonal deception
Interpersonal deception
The fundamental topoi of relational communication
Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication
Comparatively speaking
Communication Yearbook 3
Honesty, Fabrication, and the Enhancement of Credibility
The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Effects of Preinteraction Expectancies and Target Communication on Perceiver Reciprocity and Compensation in Dyadic Interaction
Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness of deception on interpersonal perceptions
Fishy-looking liars
Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar
Nonverbal Expectancies and the Evaluative Consequences of Violations
The Nature of Conversational Involvement and Nonverbal Encoding Patterns
Prepared Lies, Spontaneous Lies, Machiavellianism, and Nonverbal Communication
| Obras citantes distintas | 21 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,66 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1994 - 2025 (32) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 21 |