Powers of War

Fighting, Knowledge, and Critique1

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2283455
AutoresTarak Barkawi (0000-0001-5526-5055, University of Cambridge, autor de correspondencia), Shane Brighton (University of Sussex)
Año2011
Volumen5
Número2
Páginas126-143
Fecha de publicación2011-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Political Sociology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1749-5679 • E-ISSN: 1749-5687
EditorialOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00125.x
OpenAlexW2125850933
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas101
Referencias citadas18

This paper approaches the ontology of war by asking why, despite its constitutive function for politics and society, has war never been made the object of an academic discipline? Through an analysis of the relationship between war and knowledge about war, we argue that the ontology of war is such that it disrupts foundational claims of the kind necessary for conventional forms of academic disciplinarity. At the center of the ontology of war is fighting, an idea we recover from Clausewitz. A moment of radical contingency, fighting both compromises knowledge about war and forces the unmaking and remaking of social and political orders. These generative powers of war operate through the production of systems of knowledge and their institutionalization in the academy, the state and wider society. Although of existential significance for political authority, these knowledges are vulnerable to the very contingency of war that produces them. This complex of relations between war, knowledge, and power we term War/Truth. As such, an analytical framework adequate to war requires a reflexive relation to truth claims. We clear the ground for such a “critical war studies.”

Library science · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Law · Political Theology and Sovereignty