Society for Medical Anthropology Statement on Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2289132
AutoresM Buchbinder (0000-0002-2319-662X, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Joanna Mishtal (0000-0002-3292-7236, University of Central Florida), Elyse Ona Singer (University of Oklahoma), Claire L Wendland (0000-0002-6323-2082, University of Wisconsin‐Madison, Departments of Anthropology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, autor de correspondencia)
Año2022
Volumen36
Número4
Páginas433-441
Fecha de publicación2022-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Anthropology Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0745-5194 • E-ISSN: 1548-1387
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/maq.12741
PMID36433774
OpenAlexW4309990501
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas6
Referencias citadas51

This statement summarizes key findings from anthropological and related scholarship on the harmful consequences of inadequate abortion access, leading the Society for Medical Anthropology to register profound concern about the recent Supreme Court decision inDobbs v. Jackson. After circulation to SMA members for input, a finalized version passed a membership vote by an overwhelming margin. This statement complements one produced by the Council for Anthropology and Reproduction,available here

Abortion · Medical anthropology · Political science · Scholarship · Sociology · Statement (logic · Supreme court · Anthropology · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Law · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Reproductive Health and Technologies