Community Landscape Preferences for Reuse of Soviet-Era Post-Agricultural Brownfields-What's the Difference

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2291508
AutoresJosef Navrátil (0000-0002-4600-1012, Department of Environmental Geography Institute of Geonics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, autor de correspondencia), Stanislav Martinát (0000-0003-4060-2009, Department of Environmental Geography Institute of Geonics of the Czech Academy of Sciences), Richard J Hewitt (0000-0003-4169-8647, Transport, Infrastructure, and Territory Research Group (tGIS), Geography Department, Faculty of Geography and History Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)), Ryan J Frazier (0000-0001-8408-8393, Geography, Environment, and Sustainability Department Weber State University), Petr Klusáček (0000-0001-9391-1126, Department of Environmental Geography Institute of Geonics of the Czech Academy of Sciences), Jaroslav Škrabal (0000-0002-4685-9836, School of Business Administration in Karvina Silesian University in Opava), Tomáš Krejčí (0000-0002-4638-7533, Department of Environmental Geography Institute of Geonics of the Czech Academy of Sciences), Ruksana Osman (0000-0002-1066-7664, Department of Environmental Geography Institute of Geonics of the Czech Academy of Sciences), Robert Osman, Kamil Pícha (0000-0002-1153-8055, Faculty of Economics University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)
Año2023
Volumen88
Número2
Páginas362-391
Fecha de publicación2023-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaRural Sociology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0036-0112 • E-ISSN: 1549-0831
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ruso.12479
OpenAlexW4319790633
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas90

Reuse preferences for post-agricultural brownfields on former socialist agricultural premises in CEE countries are likely to be diverse and may depend on communities' experiences. Our research question is to reveal, through a questionnaire survey of 774 respondents from 180 communities, the difference in reuse preferences among communities with different experiences: communities where former collective farm sites had been abandoned (leaving a post-agricultural brownfield), those where such sites had remained in continuous agricultural use, and those where such sites had been abandoned and later remediated or reused. The responses from the three types of communities were compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests and the structure of preferences was analyzed by Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling. Communities with an existing post-agricultural brownfield prefer housing and leisure activities, while communities with sites in continuous agricultural production prefer agrarian uses. Two main poles of choice were identified-productive and non-productive uses. While productive uses are preferred by respondents from communities with continuous agricultural production, non-productive uses are preferred by communities with former post-agricultural brownfields. The presence of post-agricultural brownfields within the community is an important factor in determining a community's preferences for its reuse. When agricultural sites are abandoned, communities' preferences for its reuse also change

Agrarian society · Agricultural economics · Agricultural land · Agricultural productivity · Agriculture · Brownfield · Business · Civil engineering · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Redevelopment · Reuse · Engineering · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Urban Green Space and Health · Urbanization and City Planning