Defending the Indeterminacy Thesis
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 23175353 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Mark Tushnet (0000-0002-9316-0905, autor de correspondencia), Mark V Tushnet |
| Año | 1998 |
| Páginas | 223-238 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1998-09-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | CHAPTER |
| Revista | Analyzing law (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Editorial | Oxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oso/9780198265832.003.0018 |
| OpenAlex | W4388418199 |
| ISBN | 9780198265832 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
In Determinacy, Objectivity, and Authority, Jules Coleman and Brian Leiter address what they describe as attacks on analytic jurisprudence from critical legal studies and other forms of modern American legal thought. Although Coleman and Leiter agree that there are ‘important ways in which the set of legal reasons will be indeterminate’, and that ‘certain forms of indeterminacy can pose a problem for the possibility of legitimate governance by law’, they conclude that these problems ‘are in no way fatal to the possibility of legitimate authority’.
Corporate governance · Determinacy · Economics · Epistemology · Indeterminacy (philosophy) · Indeterminate · Jurisprudence · Law and economics · Management · Objectivity (philosophy) · Political science · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Free Will and Agency · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,14 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2004 - 2013 (10) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |