Practitioners' Views about Equity within Prenatal Services
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2321324 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Priscilla Alderson (0000-0003-4002-4501, University of London), Clare Williams (0000-0001-6315-5534, King's College London), Bobbie Farsides (0000-0002-5477-0612, King's College London) |
| Año | 2004 |
| Volumen | 38 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 61-80 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2004-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0038-0385 • E-ISSN: 1469-8684 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0038038504039361 |
| OpenAlex | W2073075963 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 6 |
| Referencias citadas | 26 |
The British National Health Service (NHS) is based on principles of equal access, treatment and outcomes.This article reviews health professionals' aims to provide equitable prenatal services and their views on whether women could be equal in their access to services, understanding during choice-making, and satisfaction about their care. Inequalities which compromise equity, conflicting meanings of equity, and the contribution of in-hospital ethics seminars to ethical health services are considered. Qualitative research, combining sociological and philosophical methods, investigated the experiences of health care staff attempting to provide equitable services and their practical and ethical problems. A total of 70 staff at a teaching hospital and a district general hospital took part in semi-structured interviews, followed by 11 innovative in-hospital ethics seminars based on themes derived from the interviews.The 56 seminar participants usually began with clear statements of their equitable aims, but, encouraged by the health care ethicist, they went on to discuss their many concerns about obstacles which complicated the achievement of these aims. The sociological-ethics seminars provided unique opportunities for multi-disciplinary discussion of these inequalities and their impact on equitable intentions in health care. Analysis of the contradictions revealed during the seminars is guided by sociological theories that seek to explain the persistence of inequalities in health, and how NHS policies appear to perpetuate and increase them, despite practitioners' stated intentions to promote equality
Compromise · Equity (law) · Health care · Health equity · Inequality · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Law · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
A 'healthy baby
Is advice incompatible with autonomous informed choice? Women’s perceptions of advice in the context of antenatal screening
Personalized ethics
Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening
Facilitating choice, framing choice
Expecting Motherhood? Stratifying Reproduction in 21st-century Scottish Abortion Practice
The Widening Gap
Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics
Basic Content Analysis
Medical Uncertainty Revisited
Medical Nemesis
Making of the English Working Class
Testing Women, Testing the Fetus
Regulating the gene
Conflicting perceptions of the fetus
Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion
Eugenics and the New Genetics in Britain
From what and why did genetics emerge as a medical specialism in the 1970s in the UK? A case-history of research, policy and services in the Manchester region of the NHS
Medical Nemesis
Is nondirectiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing
Down's syndrome
Health policy and the new genetics
Theorising Inequalities in Health
Introduction
Stratification, Class and Health
| Obras citantes distintas | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,29 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2005 - 2014 (10) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 5 |