Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Practitioners' Views about Equity within Prenatal Services

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2321324
AutoresPriscilla Alderson (0000-0003-4002-4501, University of London), Clare Williams (0000-0001-6315-5534, King's College London), Bobbie Farsides (0000-0002-5477-0612, King's College London)
Año2004
Volumen38
Número1
Páginas61-80
Fecha de publicación2004-02-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSociology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0038-0385 • E-ISSN: 1469-8684
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0038038504039361
OpenAlexW2073075963
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas6
Referencias citadas26

The British National Health Service (NHS) is based on principles of equal access, treatment and outcomes.This article reviews health professionals' aims to provide equitable prenatal services and their views on whether women could be equal in their access to services, understanding during choice-making, and satisfaction about their care. Inequalities which compromise equity, conflicting meanings of equity, and the contribution of in-hospital ethics seminars to ethical health services are considered. Qualitative research, combining sociological and philosophical methods, investigated the experiences of health care staff attempting to provide equitable services and their practical and ethical problems. A total of 70 staff at a teaching hospital and a district general hospital took part in semi-structured interviews, followed by 11 innovative in-hospital ethics seminars based on themes derived from the interviews.The 56 seminar participants usually began with clear statements of their equitable aims, but, encouraged by the health care ethicist, they went on to discuss their many concerns about obstacles which complicated the achievement of these aims. The sociological-ethics seminars provided unique opportunities for multi-disciplinary discussion of these inequalities and their impact on equitable intentions in health care. Analysis of the contradictions revealed during the seminars is guided by sociological theories that seek to explain the persistence of inequalities in health, and how NHS policies appear to perpetuate and increase them, despite practitioners' stated intentions to promote equality

Compromise · Equity (law) · Health care · Health equity · Inequality · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Law · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

  • A 'healthy baby

    Open Access•Kathryn Ehrich, Clare Williams•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2010

  • Is advice incompatible with autonomous informed choice? Women’s perceptions of advice in the context of antenatal screening

    Open Access•Shenaz Ahmed, Louise D Bryant et al.•Health Expectations•2014

  • Personalized ethics

    Open Access•Mianna Meskus•BioSocieties•2012

  • Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening

    Open Access•Clare Williams, Jane Sandall et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2005

  • Facilitating choice, framing choice

    Open Access•Clare Williams, Kathryn Ehrich et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2007

  • Expecting Motherhood? Stratifying Reproduction in 21st-century Scottish Abortion Practice

    Open Access•Siân M Beynon‐jone, Siân M Beynon-Jone et al.•Sociology•2013

  • The Widening Gap

    Mary Shaw, Daniel Dorling et al.•Widening Gap•1999

  • Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics

    George Weisz•Social Science Perspectives on…•1990

  • Basic Content Analysis

    Robert Philip Weber, Robert Weber•Basic Content Analysis•1990

  • Medical Uncertainty Revisited

    Richard C Fox, Renee C Fox•Handbook of Social Studies in…•2000

  • Medical Nemesis

    Ivan Illich•Health Care Management Review•1977

  • Making of the English Working Class

    E P Thompson•Making of the English Working Class•2013

  • Testing Women, Testing the Fetus

    Rayna Rapp•Testing Women, Testing the Fetus•2004

  • Regulating the gene

    Andrew Webster, Annemiek Nelis•Health Risk & Society•1999

  • Conflicting perceptions of the fetus

    Open Access•Clare Williams, Priscilla Alderson et al.•New Genetics and Society•2001

  • Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion

    Adrienne Asch•American Journal of Public Health•1999

  • Eugenics and the New Genetics in Britain

    Open Access•Anne Kerr, Sarah Cunningham-Burley et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•1998

  • From what and why did genetics emerge as a medical specialism in the 1970s in the UK? A case-history of research, policy and services in the Manchester region of the NHS

    Open Access•Peter A Coventry, John V Pickstone•Social Science & Medicine•1999

  • Medical Nemesis

    Elliott A Krause, Ivan Illich•Technology and Culture•1977

  • Is nondirectiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing

    Open Access•Clare Williams, Priscilla Alderson et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2002

  • Down's syndrome

    Open Access•Priscilla Alderson•Social Science & Medicine•2001

  • Health policy and the new genetics

    Open Access•Patricia A Kaufert•Social Science & Medicine•2000

  • Theorising Inequalities in Health

    Open Access•Jennie Popay, Gareth Williams et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•1998

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Mel Bartley, D Blane et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•1998

  • Stratification, Class and Health

    Open Access•Graham Scambler, Paul Higgs•Sociology•1999

Obras citantes distintas6
Citas por año0,29
Intervalo de citas2005 - 2014 (10)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 5
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae