Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The social organization of QCA scholarship

Publication practices and educational integration

Datos Bibliográficos

ID23310643
AutoresDawid Tatarczyk (0000-0003-4042-7562, Institute of Political Science, autor de correspondencia)
Año2026
Páginas1-10
Fecha de publicación2026-07-28
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1364-5579 • E-ISSN: 1464-5300
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13645579.2026.2709887
OpenAlexW7171517727
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas19

This research note examines the social organization of the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) community by analyzing how methodological knowledge is produced through publication and reproduced through teaching. Drawing on publication data from the COMPASSS network (1981–2020) and an original survey of international QCA instructors, the study explores patterns of authorship, scholarly visibility, and pedagogical authority. Findings indicate that while mixed-gender collaboration is common in journal publishing, important gender asymmetries persist, particularly in book authorship, where male scholars remain disproportionately represented. The teaching of QCA is also concentrated among a relatively small group of internationally active instructors, suggesting that methodological expertise is disseminated through specialized professional networks. Variation in the gender composition of assigned readings further highlights uneven patterns of scholarly visibility. The study contributes to the sociology of knowledge by providing an exploratory mapping of the institutional and social structures that shape methodological communities.

Informal organization · Organization studies · Organizational theory · Qualitative research · Research methodology · Social organization · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research · Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata

  • Redesigning Social Inquiry

    C C Ragin•Redesigning Social Inquiry•2008

  • Gender Inequality in Research Productivity During the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Ruomeng Cui, Hao Ding et al.•Manufacturing & Service…•2022

  • QCA with R

    Open Access•Adrian Dușa•QCA with R•2019

  • Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences

    Open Access•Carsten Q Schneider, Claudius Wagemann•Set-Theoretic Methods for the…•2012

  • The Knowledge Polity

    Paul A Djupe, A E Sokhey et al.•Knowledge Polity•2022

  • The origins, development, and application of Qualitative Comparative Analysis

    Open Access•A Marx, Benoît Rihoux et al.•European Political Science Review•2014

  • Gender in the Journals

    Open Access•Dawn Langan Teele, Kathleen Thelen•PS Political Science & Politics•2017

  • How Many Citations to Women Is “Enough”? Estimates of Gender Representation in Political Science

    Open Access•Michelle L Dion, Stephen Mark Mitchell•PS Political Science & Politics•2020

  • New Medium, Same Story? Gender Gaps in Book Publishing

    Open Access•David Samuels, Dawn Langan Teele•PS Political Science & Politics•2021

  • The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network

    Open Access•James Moody•American Sociological Review•2004

  • Gender Differences in Productivity

    Open Access•E Leahey•Gender & Society•2006

  • Tqca

    Open Access•Neal Caren, Aaron Panofsky•Sociological Methods & Research•2005

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae