Role Playing and the Study of Jury Behavior
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2331383 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Norbert L Kerr (0000-0003-0115-0767, University of California San Diego), David R Nerenz (0000-0002-5050-5950, University of California San Diego), David Herrick (University of California San Diego), David R Herrick (University of California San Diego) |
| Año | 1979 |
| Volumen | 7 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 337-355 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1979-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Sociological Methods & Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0049-1241 • E-ISSN: 1552-8294 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/004912417900700305 |
| OpenAlex | W2008062476 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 17 |
| Referencias citadas | 9 |
Widespread use of simulated trials and mock juries to study jury behavior has stimulated concern for the external validity ofsuch simulations. A study is reported which examined the role-playing nature of mock jury deliberation. Subjects were either given typical role-playing instructions, or were led to believe that they were deciding an actual student discipline case. The two conditions did not differ significantly on their group or individual verdicts, sentence recommendations, deliberation time, or estimated social decision schemes. The significance and limitations of these results for the study of jury behavior are discussed
Deliberation · Jury · Political science · Politics · Sentence · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Psychology · Social Psychology
Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments
Pretrial publicity
Lifting the Veil
Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation
Social transition schemes
Severity of prescribed penalty and mock jurors' verdicts
The ecological validity of jury simulations
Principles of Forecasting
Storytelling Rituals in Jury Deliberations
The effects of deliberations and religious identity on mock jurors’ verdicts
Jurors’ Responses to Expert Witness Testimony
Psychological and Policy Perspectives on the Law
Reacting to Rape
Jury decision making
Racism in the Jury Box
Much Ado About Deception
Friendship and Conformity in Group Opinions
Group decision and social interaction
Group size, member ability, and social decision schemes on an intellective task
Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis
Quantifying Burdens of Proof
| Obras citantes distintas | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,35 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1978 - 2019 (42) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 11 |