The Influence of Data Collection Method on Structural Models
A Comparison of a Mail, a Telephone, and a Face-to-Face Survey
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2331771 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Edith D De Leeuw (0000-0003-4601-0784, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands), Gideon J Mellenbergh (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands), Joop J Hox (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands) |
| Año | 1996 |
| Volumen | 24 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 443-472 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1996-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Sociological Methods & Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0049-1241 • E-ISSN: 1552-8294 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0049124196024004002 |
| OpenAlex | W2317776490 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 13 |
| Referencias citadas | 15 |
In survey data, four potential sources of measurement error can jeopardize the results: the respondents, the interviewers, the questions, and the data collection method. In the past two decades, a shift has occurred in the way survey data are collected; telephone surveys and, to a lesser degree, mail surveys are now more extensively used. This has stimulated empirical research on the influence of the data collection method on data quality. Most of these mode comparisons used univariate criteria. In this study we concentrate on the potential influence of the data collection method on two substantive structural models. A controlled field experiment was conducted in which a mail, a telephone, and a face-to-face survey were compared. Using multigroup comparisons, two substantive structural equation models (one for loneliness and one for general well-being) were compared across the different data collection methods. The different data collection methods turned out to produce significantly different covariance matrices. Subsequent analyses showed that structural models, based on these covariance matrices, also differed
Covariance · Data collection · Data quality · Econometrics · Multivariate statistics · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Survey data collection · Survey methodology · Univariate · Computer Science · Engineering · Mathematics · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
More Than Ability
The Stability and Change of Loneliness Across the Life Span
An Experimental Test of Mail Surveys as a Tool for Social Inquiry in Russia
Beyond the In-Person Interview? How Interview Quality Varies Across In-person, Telephone, and Skype Interviews
An Assessment of the Generalizability of Internet Surveys
Are Prepaid Monetary Incentives Sufficient for Reducing Panel Attrition and Optimizing the Response Rate? An Experiment in the Context of a Multi-Wave Panel with a Sequential Mixed-Mode Design
Measuring Mutual Help Willingness and Criteria among Hong Kong People
The Limitations of Stranger-Interviewers in Rural Kenya
Measurement Effects of Survey Mode on the Equivalence of Attitudinal Rating Scale Questions
The Conceptual and Relational Structure of Subjective Well-Being, Neuroticism, and Extraversion
An assessment of the construct validity of Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-Being
Race Attribution Modifies the Association Between Daily Discrimination and Major Depressive Disorder Among Blacks
Dimensions Of Well-Being And Their Measurement
The Development of a Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale
Asymptotically distribution‐free methods for the analysis of covariance structures
Replicate, again and again
Replicability as a publication criterion
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures
Face-to-Face Interviews and Mailed Questionnaires
A Test of the Form-Resistant Correlation Hypothesis
Developing and testing a model of loneliness
Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys
Mail and Telephone Surveys
Structures of Well-Being
Structure of Well-Being
The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys
| Obras citantes distintas | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,52 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2001 - 2020 (20) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 12 |