The Nature of the Forbid/Allow Asymmetry

As the verbs forbid and allow are considered each other's counterparts, one would expect the answers to questions worded with forbid or allow to be each other's opposites. Research shows that this is not the case. Use of these verbs in surveys causes a wording effect known as the forbid/allow asymmetry. Findings do not reveal, however, where the asymmetry originates: during the stage of attitude localization or during the mapping of the attitude onto one of the response options. In this article, a correlational design was used. Two experiments were carried out focusing on the congenericity of forbid and allow, one on attitudes toward environmental issues and a replication on attitudes concerning ethnic groups. Results of both experiments show that forbid and allow questions are congeneric; that is, they measure the same attitude. Answers to forbid/allow questions reflect similar attitudes that are expressed differently on the answering scales due to the use of both verbs. In addition, the explanation of the effect focusing on the answering behavior of indifferent respondents is discussed and explored

Asymmetry · Epistemology · Replication (statistics) · Statistics · Computer Science · Cultural Differences and Values · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

• Types of Discrimination as Predictors of Identity Concealment in a Sexual and Gender Minority Sample

  Open Access•Charlie Giraud, Michelle T Leonard et al.•Sexuality & Culture•2024

  Añadir item

• Gender attitudes in the Arab region – The role of framing and priming effects

  Open Access•Ann‐kristin Reitmann, Ann-Kristin Reitmann et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2020

  Añadir item

• Agree or Disagree? Cognitive Processes in Answering Contrastive Survey Questions

  Naomi Kamoen, Bregje Holleman et al.•Discourse Processes•2011

  Añadir item

• Measuring Attitudes About Intimate Partner Violence Against Women

  Open Access•Kathryn M Yount, Kristin Vanderende et al.•Demography•2014

  Añadir item

• A Survey Experiment of Women’s Attitudes About Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in Rural Bangladesh

  Open Access•Kathryn M Yount, Nafisa Halim et al.•Demography•2013

  Añadir item

• Response effects to attitudinal questions about domestic violence against women

  Open Access•Kathryn M Yount, Nafisa Halim et al.•Social Science Research•2011

  Añadir item

• Why Are Negative Questions Difficult to Answer? On the Processing of Linguistic Contrasts in Surveys

  Naomi Kamoen, Bregje Holleman et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2017

  Añadir item

• Once again on norms and comparison classes

  Open Access•Elena Tribushinina•Linguistics•2011

  Añadir item

• Human inference

  Richard E Nisbett•Human inference•1980

  Añadir item

• Statistical Analysis of Sets of Congeneric Tests

  Open Access•Karl G Jöreskog•Psychometrika•1971

  Añadir item

• The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy

  Open Access•Herbert H Clark•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1973

  Añadir item

• Attitude intensity, importance, and certainty and susceptibility to response effects

  Jon A Krosnick, Howard Schuman•Journal of Personality and Social…•1988

  Añadir item

• Experiments in Wording Questions

  Donald Rugg, Donald E Rugg•Public Opinion Quarterly•1941

  Añadir item

• Not Forbidding Isn't Allowing

  Hans‐j Hippler, Hans-J Hippler et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1986

  Añadir item

• The feature-positive effect in the self-perception process

  Russell H Fazio, Steven J Sherman et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1982

  Añadir item

• Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement

  Roger Tourangeau, Kenneth A Rasinski•Psychological Bulletin•1988

  Añadir item