Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Biotechnology and the European public

Datos Bibliográficos

ID23329751
AutoresGeorge Gaskell (0000-0001-6135-9496, London School of Economics and Political Science), Nick Allum (0000-0002-1746-2514), Martin W Bauer (0000-0002-0800-8133, London School of Economics and Political Science), Martin Bauer (0000-0003-4818-1560), John Durant (0009-0008-0951-9278, Museum of Science), Agnes Allansdottir (0000-0003-0961-2380, University of Siena), Heinz Bonfadelli (University of Zurich), Daniel Boy (0000-0001-6517-1538, Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques), Suzanne De Cheveigné (0000-0002-8718-4820, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Björn Fjæstad (Mid Sweden University), Jan M Gutteling (0000-0002-1173-9084, University of Twente), Juergen Hampel, Erling Jelsøe (Roskilde University), Jorge Correia Jesuino (0000-0002-3706-9541, Employment Agency), Matthias Kohring (0000-0001-9819-1906, Friedrich Schiller University Jena), Nicole Kronberger (0000-0001-7128-3990), Cees Midden (Eindhoven University of Technology), Torben Hviid Nielsen (0000-0002-8205-5544, University of Oslo), Andrzej Przestalski (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań), Timo Rusanen (University of Eastern Finland), George Sakellaris (National Hellenic Research Foundation), Helge Torgersen (Austrian Academy of Sciences), Tomasz Twardowski (0000-0001-9153-6561, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences), Wolfgang Wagner (0000-0001-5191-2470)
Año2000
Volumen18
Número9
Páginas935-938
Fecha de publicación2000-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaNature Biotechnology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1087-0156 • E-ISSN: 1546-1696
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1038/79403
PMID10973210
OpenAlexW2126357475
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas108
Referencias citadas2

Biology · Gene · Genetically modified organism · Opposition (politics) · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Biotechnology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering · Genetically Modified Organisms Research · Genetics · Law

  • Public’s attitudes towards autocidal trap in Malaysia

    Open Access•Noor Sharizad Rusly, Ahmad Firdhaus Arham et al.•International Journal of Health…•2024

  • Reconsidering the Mode 2 and the Triple Helix

    Open Access•Juha Tuunainen•Science & Technology Studies•2002

  • Genetically modified foods

    Open Access•Isabella Ribeiro de Figueiredo Vieira, Teresa R S Brandão et al.•DEMETRA Alimentação Nutrição &…•2020

  • Science communication scholarship in Lithuania

    Open Access•Austė Valinčiūtė•Studies in Communication Sciences•2018

  • Austria

    HelgeFranz Torgersen, HelgeFranz Torgersen HelgeFranz Torgersen et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2000

  • Arenas, Platforms, and the Biotechnology Movement

    Open Access•Martin W Bauer•Science Communication•2002

  • An analysis of public attitudes in Australia towards applications of biotechnology to humans

    Open Access•Conal Monaghan, Boris Bizumic et al.•Technology in Society•2020

  • The boundless body

    Susanne Lundin•Ethnos•1999

  • Determinants of stakeholders’ attitudes and intentions toward supporting the use of Wolbachia-infected Aedes mosquitoes for dengue control

    Open Access•Ahmad Firdhaus Arham, Latifah Amin et al.•BMC Public Health•2021

  • Factors influencing public acceptance of innovative food technologies and products

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist•Trends in Food Science & Technology•2008

  • The “Trust Gap” Hypothesis

    Open Access•Susanna Hornig Priest, Heinz Bonfadelli et al.•Risk Analysis•2003

  • GM Foods and the Misperception of Risk Perception

    Open Access•George Gaskell, Nick Allum et al.•Risk Analysis•2004

  • Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist, Christina Hartmann•Nature Food•2020

  • Biotechnology in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Jan M Gutteling•Public Understanding of Science•2002

  • Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology

    Open Access•Martin W Bauer•Public Understanding of Science•2002

  • Ethics of Sustainable Development – a Study of Swedish Regulations for Genetically Modified Organisms

    Open Access•Mikael Karlsson•Journal of Agricultural and…•2003

  • Fogging to combat dengue

    Open Access•Ahmad Firdhaus Arham, Latifah Amin et al.•BMC Public Health•2023

  • To do, or not to do?”

    Open Access•Ahmad Firdhaus Arham, Latifah Amin et al.•BMC Public Health•2022

  • Examining Personal and Media Factors Associated with Attitude towards Genetically Modified Foods among University Students in Kunming, China

    Open Access•Li Li, John Robert Bautista•International Journal of…•2019

  • Investigating the knowledge of and public attitudes towards genetic testing within the Visegrad countries

    Open Access•Klára Bíró, Viktor Dombrádi et al.•BMC Public Health•2020

  • Investigating determinants of willingness to buy genetically modified foods

    Open Access•Soghra Aliasgharzadeh, Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi et al.•British Food Journal•2023

  • Roadblock on the Highway to Heaven? The Effect of Religion on Cluster Development in Controversial Industries

    Open Access•Olga M Khessina, Samira Reis et al.•Administrative Science Quarterly•2025

  • Of Society, Nature, and Health

    Kathleen M Rose, Dominique Brossard et al.•Environmental Communication•2020

  • The Swedish Media Debate on GMO Between 1994 and 2018

    Open Access•Klara Fischer, Sebastian Heß•Environmental Communication•2022

  • Public Opinion Towards Gene Drive as a Pest Control Approach for Biodiversity Conservation and the Association of Underlying Worldviews

    Open Access•Edith A Macdonald, Jovana Balanovic et al.•Environmental Communication•2020

  • Social readiness of adaptation technologies

    Open Access•Rob Bellamy•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2019

  • Factors influencing stakeholders' attitudes toward cross-kingdom gene transfer in rice

    Open Access•Latifah Amin, Md Abul Kalam Azad et al.•New Genetics and Society•2014

  • Public engagement in Japanese policy-making

    Open Access•Ryuma Shineha, Kazuto Kato et al.•New Genetics and Society•2009

  • Beyond the genome

    Open Access•Peter Glasner•New Genetics and Society•2002

  • Natural and unnatural

    Open Access•Monica Pivetti•New Genetics and Society•2007

  • Expert relevance and the use of context-driven heuristic processes in risk perception

    Piers Fleming, Ellen Townsend et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2012

  • Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Food with a Specific Consumer Benefit in Food Allergic Consumers and Non‐food Allergic Consumers

    Susan Miles, Christine Häfner et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2006

  • How can we Make Food Risk Communication Better

    Ragnar E Lofstedt•Journal of Risk Research•2006

  • Ambivalent’ individual preferences towards biotechnology in the European Union

    Joan Costa-Font, Elias Mossialos•Journal of Risk Research•2005

  • Attitude gaps between conventional plant breeding crops and genetically modified crops, and psychological models determining the acceptance of the two crops

    Yutaka Tanaka•Journal of Risk Research•2012

  • Aquaculture

    Anne Katrin Schlag•Journal of Risk Research•2010

  • Wrestling with uncertain risks

    Marjolein B A van Asselt, Marjolein van Asselt et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2008

  • Moral “Lock-In” in Responsible Innovation

    Open Access•M R N Bruijnis, Vincent Blok et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2015

  • The Precautionary Principle in EU Regulation of GMOs

    Open Access•Artem Anyshchenko•Journal of Agricultural and…•2019

  • Respecting The Autonomy of European and American Consumers

    Open Access•Alan Rubel, Robert Streiffer•Journal of Agricultural and…•2005

  • Attitudes towards reproductive technologies for humans

    Open Access•Cécile Muller, Daniel Shepherd•Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of…•2009

  • Mapping Perceptions of Science in End-of-Century Europe

    Open Access•Rafael Pardo, Rafael I Pardo et al.•Science Communication•2006

  • To Eat or Not to Eat

    Open Access•Ivanka Pjesivac, Marlit Hayslett et al.•Science Communication•2020

  • Early Exposures to Ecogenomics

    Open Access•Mark Bos, Mark J W Bos et al.•Science Communication•2010

  • The Development of Public Perception Research in the Genomics Field

    Open Access•Renske Pin, Renske R Pin et al.•Science Communication•2008

  • Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK

    Open Access•Adam Corner, Karen Parkhill et al.•Global Environmental Change•2013

  • Creating Public Alienation

    Brian Wynne•Science as Culture•2001

  • Understanding Public Calls for Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods

    Shauna Nep, Kieran C O''Doherty•Society & Natural Resources•2012

  • Citizen views on genome editing

    Open Access•Gesa Busch, Erin Ryan et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2021

  • Multiple aspects of unnaturalness

    Open Access•Henrik Mielby, Peter Sandøe et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2013

  • Regulating genetically modified food

    Open Access•Anton E Wohlers•Politics and the Life Sciences•2010

  • Divorced but co-habiting

    Open Access•George Asiamah•Journal of European Integration•2024

  • The big bug

    Open Access•Angela Marberg, Hans Van Kranenburg et al.•Food Policy•2017

  • Contesting a Hybrid Firm at a Traditional University

    Open Access•Juha Tuunainen•Social Studies of Science•2005

  • Big science, little news

    Open Access•Massimiano Bucchi, Renato G Mazzolini•Public Understanding of Science•2003

  • Attitudes towards the use of genetically modified animals in research

    Open Access•Catherine A Schuppli, Daniel M Weary•Public Understanding of Science•2010

  • Attitudes towards genetics

    Open Access•Luisa Massarani, Luisa Medeiros Massarani et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2005

  • Before and after the Chinese gene-edited human babies

    Open Access•Xing Zhang, Anfan Chen et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2021

  • The role of scientific knowledge in shaping public attitudes to GM technologies

    Open Access•Henrik Mielby, Peter Sandøe et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2013

  • Designer babies on tap? Medical students' attitudes to pre-implantation genetic screening

    Open Access•Gerhard Meisenberg•Public Understanding of Science•2009

  • Religiosity as a perceptual filter

    Open Access•Dominique Brossard, Dietram A Scheufele et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2009

  • Dynamics of List-Server Discussion on Genetically Modified Foods

    Open Access•Marcia L Triunfol, Marcia Triunfol et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2004

  • The Cognitive Dimension of Public Perceptions of Science

    Open Access•Rafael Pardo, Rafael I Pardo et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2004

  • “Knight in shining armour” or “Frankenstein’s creation”? The coverage of synthetic biology in German-language media

    Open Access•Brigitte Gschmeidler, Alexandra Seiringer•Public Understanding of Science•2012

  • Factors influencing Malaysian public attitudes to agro-biotechnology

    Open Access•Latifah Amin, Jamil Ahmad et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2011

  • Attitudes to genetically modified food over time

    Open Access•Mathew D Marques, Christine Critchley et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2015

  • Understanding attitudes towards the use of animals in research using an online public engagement tool

    Open Access•Catherine A Schuppli, Carla Forte Maiolino Molento et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2015

  • Lay representations of artificial intelligence and autonomous military machines

    Open Access•W Wagner, Auli Viidalepp et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2023

  • Man-made black holes and Big Bangs

    Open Access•Nelly Courvoisier, Alain Clémence et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2013

  • An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation

    Open Access•Joakim Hagelin, Hans-Erik Carlsson et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2003

  • Content, evaluations and influences in newspaper coverage of predictive genetic testing

    Open Access•Bettina Zimmermann, Noah Aebi et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2019

  • Progressing the health agenda

    Open Access•Gillian Christie•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2017

  • Human in Vitro Fertilization

    Open Access•R Rajmon, Miroslava Krejčová et al.•Anthropologia integra•2010

  • The governance of genomics

    Open Access•Herbert Gottweis•Critical Public Health•2002

  • Expert and Public Perception of Risk from Biotechnology

    Open Access•Lucia Savadori, Stefania Savio et al.•Risk Analysis•2004

  • Scientifically framed gene drive communication perceived as credible but riskier

    Open Access•Edith A Macdonald, Eric D Edwards et al.•People and Nature•2021

  • Biosafety principles for GMOs in the context of sustainable development

    Mikael Karlsson•International Journal of…•2003

  • From lab to fork

    Open Access•Paul Plummer, Johnn Andersson et al.•Environmental Innovation and…•2026

  • Regulating gene editing in agriculture and food in the European Union

    Open Access•Sonja Lindberg, Carmen Bain et al.•Sociologia Ruralis•2023

  • Fighting “Frankenfoods”

    Rachel Schurman•Social Problems•2004

  • Stakeholders’ Attitudes Toward Genetically Modified Rice in Malaysia

    Open Access•Muhammad Adzran Che Mustapa, Ahmad Firdhaus Arham et al.•SAGE Open•2021

  • Ethical Discourse on the Use of Genetically Modified Crops

    Open Access•Daniel Gregorowius, Petra Lindemann-Matthies et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2012

  • Dominos in the dairy

    Open Access•Rolf A Groeneveld, Justus Wesseler et al.•Ecological Economics•2013

  • Beliefs About Genetically Modified Foods

    EMMA LEA•Ecology of Food and Nutrition•2005

  • The perception of biotechnology in agro-forestry

    Open Access•Elisabetta Raparelli, Sofia Bajocco et al.•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Agricultural technology and land use futures

    Open Access•Peter J Burge, Paul J Burgess et al.•Land Use Policy•2009

  • Which perceived characteristics make product innovations appealing to the consumer? A study on the acceptance of fruit innovations using cross-cultural consumer segmentation

    Open Access•Marleen C Onwezen, Jos Bartels•Appetite•2011

  • Attitudes towards genetically modified and organic foods

    Open Access•Marieke Saher, Michael Lindeman et al.•Appetite•2006

  • Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations

    Open Access•Amber Ronteltap, J C M Van Trijp et al.•Appetite•2007

  • Biased perception about gene technology

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist, Christina Hartmann et al.•Appetite•2016

  • Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods

    Open Access•Maria Magnusson, Maria K Magnusson et al.•Appetite•2002

  • Food disgust sensitivity influences the perception of food hazards

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist, Angela Bearth et al.•Appetite•2020

  • Cell-cultured meat

    Open Access•J Mohorčich, Jacy Reese•Appetite•2019

  • Implicit attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) foods

    Open Access•Alexa Spence, Ellen Townsend•Appetite•2006

  • Biotecnologias, clones e quimeras sob controle social

    Open Access•Marcelo Leite, Marcelo Bernadino Brandão Leite•São Paulo em Perspectiva•2000

  • Religious Values and Environmental Concern

    Open Access•Anders Biel, Andréas Nilsson•Social Science Quarterly•2005

  • The Importance of Having a Different Opinion Europeans and GM foods

    Open Access•Enzo Loner•European Journal of Sociology•2008

  • When Disciplinary Worlds Collide

    Open Access•Juha Tuunainen•Symbolic Interaction•2005

  • Seeking Construct Validity in Interpersonal Trust Research

    Open Access•Sarah L Bulloch, Sarah Bulloch•Social Indicators Research•2013

  • Factors Influencing People’s Acceptance of Gene Technology

    Open Access•Melanie Connor, Michael Siegrist•Science Communication•2010

  • Public Opinion and Public Ignorance

    Howard Schuman, Stanley Presser•American Journal of Sociology•1980

Obras citantes distintas108
Citas por año4
Intervalo de citas1999 - 2026 (28)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoSí
Tipos de citaNeutras: 100
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae