Ethnographic and participatory approaches to research on farmers responses to climate predictions

Datos Bibliográficos

ID23338322
AutoresCarla Roncoli (0000-0002-9566-6790, autor de correspondencia)
Año2006
Volumen33
Páginas81-99
Fecha de publicación2006-12-21
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaClimate Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0936-577X • E-ISSN: 1616-1572
EditorialInter-Research Science Center (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3354/cr033081
OpenAlexW2032679065
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas79
Referencias citadas30

CR Climate Research Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsSpecials CR 33:81-99 (2006) - doi:10.3354/cr033081 Ethnographic and participatory approaches to research on farmers' responses to climate predictions Carla Roncoli* Center for Research on Environmental Decisions and South East Climate Consortium, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30605, USA *Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: This article synthesizes the state of the art in the application of ethnographic and participatory methods in climate application research. The review focuses on 2 aspects: (1) the cognitive and cultural landscape in which farmers' understanding of climate and climate information is grounded and (2) the decision-making processes and environment which shape farmers' adaptive strategies. The first part analyzes methods to elicit how farmers perceive and predict climate events and how these perspectives relate to scientific forecasts. It addresses the long-standing question of whether and how farmers understand the probabilistic nature of climate forecasts and how they assess the credibility and accuracy of such information. The second part examines approaches to characterizing the vulnerability of decision makers and to elucidating the configuration of options and obstacles that farmers face in using climate forecasts to mitigate risk. The complexities of farmers' decisions and the difficulties of identifying the exact role that climate predictions play (and, therefore, of directly attributing impacts to them) are taken into account. Finally, the review highlights efforts to transcend the localized focus of farmer-centered approaches in order to capture interactions across sectors and scales. The review concludes by proposing that climate application research move from a 'technology-adoption' paradigm to a broader perspective on vulnerability and adaptation. This shift will entail a cross-scale, multi-sited research design and an interdisciplinary mix of interactive and structured tools and techniques. It will also require that the analytical focus be expanded to encompass local communities and their multiple action spaces as well as the higher spheres of decision-making, where policy and science are shaped. KEY WORDS: Farmer participatory research · Ethnographic methods · Climate forecasts · Risk communication · Livelihood adaptation · Vulnerability Full text in pdf format PreviousNextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in CR Vol. 33, No. 1. Online publication date: December 21, 2006 Print ISSN: 0936-577X; Online ISSN: 1616-1572 Copyright © 2006 Inter-Research.

Citizen journalism · Climate change · Climate justice · Climate model · Credibility · Environmental resource management · Ethnography · Geography · Participatory action research · Political science · Sociology · Vulnerability (computing) · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Climate change impacts on agriculture · Computer Science · Ecology · Environmental Science · Species Distribution and Climate Change