Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Inquisitive Semantics

Datos Bibliográficos

ID23397809
AutoresIvano Ciardelli (0000-0001-6152-3401, Assistant Professor, Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, Ludwig Maximilian University), Jeroen Groenendijk (Professor Emeritus, Institute for Logic, Language, and Computation, University of Amsterdam), Floris Roelofsen (0000-0002-3224-5251, Associate Professor, Institute for Logic, Language, and Computation, University of Amsterdam)
Año2018
Páginas240
Fecha de publicación2018-11-22
Open AccessSí
TipoBOOK
RevistaInquisitive Semantics (SOURCE_BOOK)
EditorialOxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/oso/9780198814788.001.0001
OpenAlexW4213111222
Open LibraryOL28354391M
ISBN9780198814788
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas78
Referencias citadas74

There is an age-old tradition in linguistics and philosophy to identify the meaning of a entence with its truth-conditions. This can be explained by the fact that linguistic and philosophical investigations are usually carried out in a logical framework that was originally designed to characterize valid reasoning. Indeed, in order to determine whether an argument is valid, it suffices to know the truth-conditions of the premises and conclusion. However, argumentation is neither the sole, nor the primary function of language. One task that language more widely and ordinarily fulfils is to enable the exchange of information between conversational participants. Inquisitive semantics is a new logical framework for the analysis of this fundamental usage of language. Information exchange can be seen as a process of raising and resolving issues. Inquisitive semantics provides a new formal notion of issues, which makes it possible to model various concepts that are crucial for the analysis of linguistic information exchange in a more refined and more principled way than has been possible in previous frameworks. This book provides a detailed exposition of inquisitive semantics, and demonstrates its benefits with a range of applications in the semantic analysis of questions, coordination, modals, conditionals, and intonation.

Argument (complex analysis) · Argumentation theory · Epistemology · Exposition (narrative) · Formal semantics (linguistics) · Linguistics · Meaning (existential) · Programming language · Raising (metalworking) · Semantics (computer science) · Truth condition · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Mathematics · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Grammar, syntax & morphology · Philosophy of language · Philosophy: logic · Semantics · Semantics & pragmatics

  • Group Knowledge, Questions, and the Division of Epistemic Labour

    Open Access•Joshua Habgood-Coote•Ergo an Open Access Journal of…•2019

  • When-questions and tense in Inquisitive Semantics

    Open Access•Jos Tellings•Proceedings from Semantics and…•2019

  • Raising and resolving issues with scalar modifiers

    Open Access•Elizabeth Coppock, Thomas Brochhagen•Semantics and Pragmatics•2013

  • The landscape of speech reporting

    Open Access•Corien Bary, Emar Maier•Semantics and Pragmatics•2021

  • Logic and conversation

    Open Access•Maria Aloni•Semantics and Pragmatics•2022

  • Distributive ignorance inferences with wonder and believe

    Open Access•Anita Cremers, Alexandre Cremers et al.•Semantics and Pragmatics•2019

  • Similarity Approach Strikes Back

    Open Access•Katrin Schulz•ZAS Papers in Linguistics•2018

  • Polar questions in nɬeʔkepmxcín

    Open Access•Lisa Matthewson•Natural Language Semantics•2025

  • Pragmatic enrichment, issues and domain goals

    Open Access•Tamara Dobler•Mind & Language•2023

  • Million dollar questions

    Open Access•Daniel Hoek, R Bradley•Social Choice and Welfare•2024

  • Focus in wh-questions

    Open Access•Gionata Bocci, Giuliano Bocci et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2021

  • Polar question particles

    Open Access•Rajesh Bhatt, Veneeta Dayal•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2020

  • Properties of propositional attitude operators

    Open Access•Richard Zuber•Linguistics and Philosophy•2023

  • Suspension, Entailment, and Presupposition

    Open Access•Luis Rosa•Erkenntnis•2025

  • Ayam Sebagai Rujukan Makna Inkuisitif Berhati-hati, Sia-Sia dan Khianat Dalam Peribahasa Melayu

    Open Access•Muhammad Zaid Daud, Mary Fatimah Subet•Kajian Malaysia•2022

  • Indicative Conditionals in Objective Contexts

    Open Access•Vít Punčochář, Christopher Gauker•Theoria•2020

  • I know how to withstand the skeptic

    Open Access•Andrés Soria-Ruiz•Synthese•2025

  • Is there a norm against inquiry into pseudo-questions

    Open Access•Luis Rosa•Synthese•2025

  • Verb‐Echo Answers Do Not Involve Head Movement in Japanese

    Open Access•Daiki Matsumoto•Studia Linguistica•2025

  • Closure and Epistemic Modals

    Open Access•Justin Bledin, Tamar Lando•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2017

  • Inquiry for the mistaken and confused

    Open Access•ARIANNA FALBO•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2024

  • Credences for strict conditionals

    Open Access•Malte Willer•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2024

  • Question-relative knowledge for minimally rational agents

    Open Access•Francisca Silva•Inquiry•2024

  • Intonational Commitments

    Open Access•Deniz Rudin•Journal of Semantics•2022

  • Focused NPIs in Statements and Questions

    Open Access•Jeong, Sunwoo Jeong et al.•Journal of Semantics•2023

  • Alternatives in Counterfactuals

    Open Access•Jacopo Romoli, Paolo Santorio et al.•Journal of Semantics•2022

  • Coordinating If s

    Open Access•Jill Khoo, Justin Khoo•Journal of Semantics•2021

  • Division of Labor in the Interpretation of Declaratives and Interrogatives

    Donka F Farkas, Floris Roelofsen•Journal of Semantics•2017

  • On the Interplay Between Interpretation and Reasoning in Compelling Fallacies

    Open Access•Léo Picat, Salvador Mascarenhas•Cognitive Science•2024

  • The Role of Alternatives in Language

    Open Access•Sophie Repp, Krzysztof Spałek•Frontiers in Communication•2021

  • Just Simulating? Linguistic Support for Continuism About Remembering and Imagining

    Open Access•Kristina Liefke•Review of Philosophy and Psychology•2025

  • A typology of alternative questions in Chinese and other East Asian languages

    Open Access•Xinyi Li•Language and Linguistics 語言暨語言學•2025

  • The Syntactic Encoding of Conventional Implicatures in Sicilian Polar Questions

    Silvio Cruschina, Valentina Bianchi•Probus•2022

  • Meaning and responsibility

    Open Access•Ray Buchanan, Herbert I Schiller•Mind & Language•2023

  • The restrictor view, without covert modals

    Open Access•Ivano Ciardelli•Linguistics and Philosophy•2022

  • Counterfactuals, hyperintensionality and Hurford disjunctions

    Open Access•Hüseyin Güngör•Linguistics and Philosophy•2023

  • How to be (non-)specific

    Open Access•Marco Degano, Maria Aloni•Linguistics and Philosophy•2025

  • Asserting epistemic modals

    Open Access•Deniz Rudin•Linguistics and Philosophy•2025

  • Negation and modality in unilateral truthmaker semantics

    Open Access•Lucas Champollion, Timothée Bernard•Linguistics and Philosophy•2024

  • Semantic expressivism for epistemic modals

    Open Access•Peter Hawke, Shane Steinert‐Threlkeld•Linguistics and Philosophy•2021

  • Language games and their types

    Open Access•Jonathan Ginzburg, Kwong-Cheong Wong•Linguistics and Philosophy•2024

  • Update rules and semantic universals

    Open Access•Luca Incurvati, Giorgio Sbardolini•Linguistics and Philosophy•2023

  • Ignorance implicatures of modified numerals

    Open Access•Anita Cremers, Liz Coppock et al.•Linguistics and Philosophy•2022

  • Experiential Attitudes are Propositional

    Open Access•Kristina Liefke•Erkenntnis•2024

  • Independent alternatives

    Open Access•Richard Jefferson Booth•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • Does success entail ability

    Open Access•David Boylan•Noûs•2022

  • Knowing what to do

    Open Access•Ethan Jerzak, Alexander W Kocurek•Noûs•2025

  • What topic continuity problem

    Alexander W Kocurek•Inquiry•2025

  • Three strategies for Socratic inquisitiveness in reflective questions

    Anastasia Giannakidou, Alda Mari•Linguistics Vanguard•2025

  • Meaning and Alternatives

    Nicole Gotzner, Jacopo Romoli•Annual Review of Linguistics•2021

  • Clausal anaphors and their division of labor in Japanese

    Open Access•Yuta Tatsumi•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•2025

  • Uniqueness requirements of wh -questions in discourse

    Haoze Li•Theoretical Linguistics•2023

  • Focus and contrastive topic in questions and answers, with particular reference to Turkish

    Beste Kamali, Manfred Krifka•Theoretical Linguistics•2020

  • Towards dynamic inquisitive semantics of dialogue

    Maria Boritchev•Theoretical Linguistics•2023

  • Wh-questions in dynamic inquisitive semantics

    Open Access•Floris Roelofsen, Jakub Dotlačil•Theoretical Linguistics•2023

  • An inquisitive stroll in commitment spaces

    Edgar Onea•Theoretical Linguistics•2020

  • How to avoid overcommitment

    Dietmar Zaefferer•Theoretical Linguistics•2019

  • Building trees, building bridges

    Valentina Bianchi, Silvio Cruschina•Theoretical Linguistics•2023

  • Dynamic inquisitive semantics—looking ahead and looking back

    Open Access•Floris Roelofsen, Jakub Dotlačil•Theoretical Linguistics•2023

  • From topic to object

    Open Access•Edgar Onea, Alexandru Mardale•The Canadian Journal of…•2020

  • Disjunction and Possibility

    Open Access•Matthew Mandelkern•Philosophical Perspectives•2024

  • Temporal adverbial superlatives in Dutch

    Open Access•Jos Tellings•Linguistics in the Netherlands•2021

  • Aren’t Gitksan Negative Polar Questions Biased

    Lisa Matthewson•International Journal of American…•2026

  • Meaning without Information

    Open Access•Paolo Santorio•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2022

  • Truthmaker Semantics and Natural Language Semantics

    Open Access•Lucas Champollion•Language and Linguistics Compass•2025

  • Deriving presupposition projection in coordinations of polar questions

    Open Access•Alexandros Kalomoiros•Natural Language Semantics•2023

  • Indefinites and free choice

    Open Access•Marco Degano, Maria Aloni•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2022

  • A logic for reasoning about independent alternatives

    Open Access•Karina Nygren•Synthese•2025

  • Inquiry, reasoning and the normativity of logic

    Open Access•Maximilian van Remmen•Synthese•2024

  • Interventions in inquiry

    Open Access•James Revell Carr, Jennifer Rose Carr•Synthese•2025

  • Knowing more (about questions)

    Open Access•Joshua Habgood-Coote•Synthese•2022

  • Success Atomism

    Open Access•José Carlos Camillo•Synthese•2025

  • Non-assertoric speech acts

    Open Access•Lwenn Bussière-Caraes, Luca Incurvati et al.•Synthese•2024

  • Moral Realism, Speech Act Diversity, and Expressivism

    Open Access•N G Laskowski, Nicholas Laskowski•The Philosophical Quarterly•2019

  • Explaining presupposition projection in (coordinations of) polar questions

    Open Access•Émile Enguehard•Natural Language Semantics•2021

  • Picky predicates

    Open Access•Nadine Theiler, Floris Roelofsen et al.•Natural Language Semantics•2019

  • Quexistentials and Focus

    Open Access•Kees Hengeveld, Sabine Iatridou et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2023

  • Evoked questions and inquiring attitudes

    Open Access•Christopher Willard-Kyle, Jared Millson et al.•The Philosophical Quarterly•2024

  • Dynamic Epistemic Logic

    Open Access•Hans van Ditmarsch, Wiebe Van Der Hoek et al.•Dynamic Epistemic Logic•2008

  • Modals and ConditionalsNew and Revised Perspectives

    Angelika Kratzer•Modals and conditionals•2012

  • A Theory of Conditionals

    Robert Stalnaker, Robert C Stalnaker•Ifs•1968

  • Defaults in update semantics

    Open Access•Frank Veltman•Journal of Philosophical Logic•1996

  • Would You Believe It? The King of France is Back! (Presuppositions and Truth-Value Intuitions)

    Kai Von Fintel•Descriptions and beyond•2004

  • Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning

    Open Access•Ronald Fagin, Joseph Y Halpern•Artificial Intelligence•1987

  • The Syntax‐Phonology Interface

    Open Access•Elisabeth Selkirk•The Handbook of Phonological Theory•2011

  • Logic and Conversation

    H P Grice•Speech Acts•1975

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology

    Open Access•Paul de Lacy•Cambridge Handbook of Phonology•2007

  • Knowledge and Belief

    Open Access•P T Geach•Philosophical Books•1963

  • Counterfactuals Without Possible Worlds

    Kit Fine, Inc Journal of Philosophy•The Journal of Philosophy•2012

  • Bare plurals, bare conditionals, and only

    Kai Von Fintel•Journal of Semantics•1997

  • Predicates of Relevance and Theories of Question Embedding

    Patrick D Elliott, Nathan Klinedinst et al.•Journal of Semantics•2017

  • Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation

    Reinhard Blutner•Journal of Semantics•2000

  • On Reacting to Assertions and Polar Questions

    Donka F Farkas, Kim B Bruce•Journal of Semantics•2010

  • Free Choice Counterfactual Donkeys

    Robert Van Rooij•Journal of Semantics•2006

  • A Uniform Semantics for Declarative and Interrogative Complements

    Open Access•Nadine Theiler, Floris Roelofsen et al.•Journal of Semantics•2018

  • Conditional Questions

    J Isaacs, Kyle Rawlins•Journal of Semantics•2008

  • Three Ways to Avoid Commitments

    Sophia A Malamud, T Stephenson•Journal of Semantics•2015

  • Division of Labor in the Interpretation of Declaratives and Interrogatives

    Donka F Farkas, Floris Roelofsen•Journal of Semantics•2017

  • Linguistics and Philosophy

    Jaroslav Peregrin•Theoretical Linguistics•1998

  • Presupposition and Linguistic Context

    Lauri Karttunen•Theoretical Linguistics•1974

  • The Thought

    Gottlob Frege•Logic and Philosophy for Linguists•1975

  • Raising and resolving issues with scalar modifiers

    Open Access•Elizabeth Coppock, Thomas Brochhagen•Semantics and Pragmatics•2013

  • A Psycholinguistic Study of the Exhaustive Readings of Embedded Questions

    Anita Cremers, Alexandre Cremers et al.•Journal of Semantics•2014

  • An Inquisitive Perspective on Modals and Quantifiers

    Ivano Ciardelli, Floris Roelofsen•Annual Review of Linguistics•2018

  • The Erotetic Theory of Reasoning

    Open Access•Philipp Koralus, Salvador Mascarenhas•Philosophical Perspectives•2013

  • Question‐directed Attitudes

    Open Access•Jane Friedman•Philosophical Perspectives•2013

  • Flexibility Principles in Boolean Semantics

    Open Access•Yoad Winter•Computational Linguistics•2002

  • Semantics in Generative Grammar

    Brogan Geurts, Bart Geurts et al.•Language•1999

  • Mental Models

    Marilyn Ford, Philip N Johnson-Laird•Language•1985

  • Inquisitive dynamic epistemic logic

    Open Access•Ivano Ciardelli, Ivano A Ciardelli et al.•Synthese•2015

  • Questions as information types

    Open Access•Ivano Ciardelli•Synthese•2018

  • Inferential erotetic logic meets inquisitive semantics

    Open Access•Andrzej Wiśniewski, Dorota Leszczyńska-Jasion•Synthese•2015

  • On the semantics and logic of declaratives and interrogatives

    Open Access•Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk et al.•Synthese•2015

  • Action models in inquisitive logic

    Open Access•Thom van Gessel•Synthese•2020

  • A logic of believing, knowing, and inferring

    Open Access•Rolf A Eberle•Synthese•1974

  • If you’d wiggled A, then B would’ve changed”

    Open Access•Katrin Schulz•Synthese•2011

  • Algebraic foundations for the semantic treatment of inquisitive content

    Open Access•Floris Roelofsen•Synthese•2013

  • Dynamics of Epistemic Modality

    Malte Willer•The Philosophical Review•2013

  • Discourse structure, topicality and questioning

    Open Access•Jan Van Kuppevelt•Journal of Linguistics•1995

  • Polarity particle responses as a window onto the interpretation of questions and assertions

    Open Access•Floris Roelofsen, Donka F Farkas•Language•2015

  • Dynamic predicate logic

    Open Access•Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof•Linguistics and Philosophy•1991

  • Inquisitive Semantics

    Open Access•Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk et al.•Language and Linguistics Compass•2013

  • Free choice, modals, and imperatives

    Open Access•Maria Aloni•Natural Language Semantics•2007

  • The semantics of sluicing

    Open Access•Scott Anderboi, Scott AnderBois•Language•2014

  • Toward a Taxonomy of Projective Content

    Open Access•Judith Tonhauser, Dan Beaver et al.•Language•2013

  • Speech Acts

    Open Access•John R Searle•Speech acts•1969

Obras citantes distintas78
Citas por año6
Intervalo de citas2013 - 2026 (14)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 55
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae