Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

In Defence of Objective Bayesianism

Datos Bibliográficos

ID23398186
AutoresJon Williamson (0000-0003-0514-4209, autor de correspondencia)
Año2010
Páginas185
Fecha de publicación2010-04-29
Open AccessNo
TipoBOOK
RevistaIn defence of objective Bayesianism (SOURCE_BOOK)
EditorialOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228003.001.0001
OpenAlexW596488402
Open LibraryOL24523855M
ISBN9780199228003
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas63

Objective Bayesianism is a methodological theory that is currently applied in statistics, philosophy, artificial intelligence, physics and other sciences. This book develops the formal and philosophical foundations of the theory, at a level accessible to a graduate student with some familiarity with mathematical notation.

Bayesian probability · Epistemology · Equivocation · Mathematical economics · Artificial Intelligence · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Psychology · Bayesian Analysis · Bayesian statistical decision theory · Mathematical models · Probability & Statistics · Reasoning · Theory of knowledge

  • Mechanistic Theories of Causality Part I

    Open Access•Jon Williamson•Philosophy Compass•2011

  • Probabilistic Knowledge and Cognitive Ability

    Jason Konek•The Philosophical Review•2016

  • Statistical Inference as Severe Testing

    Open Access•Deborah G Mayo•Statistical Inference As Severe…•2018

  • Fast Methods for Drug Approval

    Open Access•Ahmad Yaman Abdin, Francesco De Pretis et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • The Impact of Meta-Induction

    Open Access•Gerhard Schurz•Philosophies•2021

  • Likelihoodism and Guidance for Belief

    Open Access•Tamaz Tokhadze•Journal for General Philosophy of…•2022

  • Does Meta-induction Justify Induction

    Open Access•J Brian Pitts•Journal for General Philosophy of…•2023

  • Formal Epistemology Meets Mechanism Design

    Open Access•J Landes•Journal for General Philosophy of…•2023

  • Direct Inference and Probabilistic Accounts of Induction

    Open Access•Jon Williamson•Journal for General Philosophy of…•2023

  • Ambiguity, Coherence and Performance

    Open Access•William Peden, Mantas Radzvilas et al.•Economics and Philosophy•2026

  • There is Nothing Magical about Bayesian Statistics

    Wojciech Świątkowski, Antonin Carrier•Basic and Applied Social Psychology•2020

  • Belief-Credence Interaction Beyond Arbitrary Partitions

    Open Access•Tamaz Tokhadze•Erkenntnis•2026

  • Evidence and Cognition

    Open Access•Samuel D Taylor, Jon Williamson•Erkenntnis•2024

  • E.T. Jaynes’s Solution to the Problem of Countable Additivity

    Open Access•Colin Elliot•Erkenntnis•2022

  • Discovering Maximum Entropy Knowledge

    Open Access•J Landes•Erkenntnis•2025

  • Epistemology and the Structure of Language

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Barrett, Travis Lacroix•Erkenntnis•2022

  • Optimality justifications and the optimality principle

    Open Access•Gerhard Schurz•Noûs•2022

  • Evil and the god of indifference

    Open Access•László Bernáth, Daniel Kodaj•International Journal for…•2020

  • Plausibility and probability in juridical proof

    Open Access•Marcello Di Bello•The International Journal of…•2019

  • The objective–subjective dichotomy and its use in describing probability

    Open Access•Arnold Baise•Interdisciplinary Science Reviews•2020

  • Confirmation bias and the plausible distribution of evidence

    Open Access•Ulrike Hahn•Mind & Society•2025

  • Permissive Rationality and Sensitivity

    Open Access•Benjamin A Levinstein•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2015

  • Perception and Probability

    Open Access•Anthony Byrne•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2021

  • Epistemic probabilities are degrees of support, not degrees of (rational) belief

    Open Access•Nevin Climenhaga•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2023

  • Bertrand's Paradox and the Maximum Entropy Principle

    Open Access•Nicholas Shackel, Darrell P Rowbottom•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2019

  • How to resolve doxastic disagreement

    Open Access•Peter Brössel, Anna‐Maria A Eder•Synthese•2014

  • How can representationalism accommodate degrees of belief? A dispositional representationalist proposal

    Open Access•Darrell P Rowbottom•Synthese•2021

  • Empirical evidence claims are a priori

    Open Access•Darrell P Rowbottom•Synthese•2013

  • The new Tweety puzzle

    Open Access•Matthias Unterhuber, Gerhard Schurz•Synthese•2013

  • Formal schemas of induction as models

    Open Access•Vlademire Kevin D Bumatay•Synthese•2022

  • Evidence amalgamation, plausibility, and cancer research

    Open Access•Marta Bertolaso, Fabio Sterpetti•Synthese•2019

  • Are non-accidental regularities a cosmic coincidence? Revisiting a central threat to Humean laws

    Open Access•Aldo Filomeno•Synthese•2021

  • Infinite frequency principles of direct inference

    Open Access•Lennart B Ackermans•Synthese•2022

  • What to do with a forecast

    Open Access•George Masterton•Synthese•2014

  • Mechanistic probability

    Open Access•Marshall Abrams•Synthese•2012

  • How to be imprecise and yet immune to sure loss

    Open Access•Karen Steele•Synthese•2021

  • Prediction with expert advice applied to the problem of prediction with expert advice

    Open Access•Daniel A Herrmann•Synthese•2022

  • Tracking probabilistic truths

    Open Access•Alexandru Baltag, Soroush Rafiee Rad et al.•Synthese•2021

  • The key to the knowledge norm of action is ambiguity

    Open Access•Patricia Rich•Synthese•2021

  • Can there be a Bayesian explanationism? On the prospects of a productive partnership

    Open Access•Fernando Cabrera, Frank Cabrera•Synthese•2017

  • Nudging for changing selves

    Open Access•Richard Pettigrew•Synthese•2023

  • Modelling mechanisms with causal cycles

    Open Access•Brendan Clarke, B Leuridan et al.•Synthese•2014

  • Conceptualising morally permissible risk imposition without quantified individual risks

    Open Access•Susanne Burri•Synthese•2022

  • Aggregating agents with opinions about different propositions

    Open Access•Richard Pettigrew•Synthese•2022

  • A Battle in the Statistics Wars

    Open Access•Mantas Radzvilas, William Peden et al.•Synthese•2021

  • Having a look at the Bayes Blind Spot

    Open Access•Miklós Rédei, Zalán Gyenis•Synthese•2021

  • A Theory of Epistemic Risk

    Open Access•Boris Babic•Philosophy of Science•2019

  • How to Model Mechanistic Hierarchies

    Open Access•Lorenzo Casini•Philosophy of Science•2016

  • Laplace’s Demon and the Adventures of His Apprentices

    Open Access•Roman Frigg, Sarah Bradley et al.•Philosophy of Science•2014

  • A Naturalist’s Guide to Objective Chance

    Open Access•Nina Emery•Philosophy of Science•2017

  • Conditional Degree of Belief and Bayesian Inference

    Open Access•Jan Sprenger•Philosophy of Science•2020

  • An Epistemic Nonconsequentialism

    Kurt Sylvan, Kurt L Sylvan•The Philosophical Review•2020

  • Calibration and Convexity

    Jon Williamson•The British Journal for the…•2012

  • The Principal Principle Implies the Principle of Indifference

    James Hawthorne, J Landes et al.•The British Journal for the…•2017

  • Bayesian Confirmation

    Peter Brössel, Franz Huber•The British Journal for the…•2015

  • Understanding the Replication Crisis as a Base Rate Fallacy

    Open Access•Anthony Bird, Alexander Bird•The British Journal for the…•2021

  • The Principal Principle Does Not Imply the Principle of Indifference

    Open Access•Richard Pettigrew•The British Journal for the…•2020

  • Objectivity and the Method of Arbitrary Functions

    Open Access•Chloé De Canson•The British Journal for the…•2022

  • Entropy and Insufficient Reason

    Open Access•Anubav Vasudevan•The British Journal for the…•2020

  • A Bayesian Account of Establishing

    Jon Williamson•The British Journal for the…•2022

  • Objective Bayesian Calibration and the Problem of Non-convex Evidence

    Gregory Wheeler•The British Journal for the…•2012

  • Mechanistic Theories of Causality Part II

    Open Access•Jon Williamson•Philosophy Compass•2011

  • The Uniqueness Thesis

    Open Access•Matthew Kopec, Michael G Titelbaum•Philosophy Compass•2016

Obras citantes distintas63
Citas por año4,2
Intervalo de citas2011 - 2026 (16)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 61
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae