The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 23398778 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Barry Stroud (University of California, Berkeley, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1984 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1984-07-05 |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | BOOK |
| Revista | The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Editorial | Oxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/0198247613.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W4299589589 |
| ISBN | 9780198247616 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 122 |
The thesis of scepticism is a thesis about the human condition: the view that we can know nothing, or that nothing is certain, or that everything is open to doubt. This book examines the sceptical thesis that we can know nothing about the physical world around us. The author argues that the sceptical thesis is motivated by a persistent philosophical problem that calls the very possibility of knowledge about the external world into question, and that the sceptical thesis is the only acceptable answer to this problem as traditionally posed. On the basis of a detailed analysis of the sceptical argument advanced by Descartes, Stroud discusses and criticizes responses to scepticism by a wide range of writers, including J. L. Austin, G. E. Moore, Kant, R. Carnap, and W. V. Quine. In this discussion, Stroud is concerned with the significance of philosophical scepticism in three different respects. Firstly, he shows philosophical scepticism to be significant as opposed to insignificant or unimportant: the philosophical study of knowledge is not an idle exercise, and the comforting popular belief that we already understand quite well how and why philosophical scepticism goes wrong is simply not true. Secondly, Stroud argues for the significance of philosophical scepticism by defending it against the charge that it is meaningless or incoherent or unintelligible, and in doing so aims to articulate as clearly as possible what exactly it does mean. Thirdly, and most importantly, Stroud argues that philosophical scepticism is significant in virtue of what it signifies, or indicates, or shows: even if the sceptical thesis turned out to be false, meant nothing, or not what it seemed to mean, the study of scepticism about the the world around us would still reveal something deep and important about human knowledge and human nature and the urge to understand them philosophically. One aim of the book is to investigate how and why this is so. Engaging in a philosophical reflection about our knowledge of the external world in this way, Stroud argues, can also reveal something about the nature of philosophical problems generally and about philosophy itself; studying the sources of the philosophical problem of scepticism can yield some degree of philosophical understanding or illumination even if we never arrive at something we can regard as a solution to that problem.
Argument (complex analysis) · Epistemology · Nothing · Philosophical theory · Quine · Skepticism · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Medicine · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Apperception and the Unreality of Tense
Epistemology of Modality and Philosophical Methodology
The Humors in Hume's Skepticism
The Veridical Experience and the Indefeasible Reasons in John McDowell’s Epistemological Disjunctivism
Ceticismo e princípios epistêmicos
A Função das Dúvidas Céticas nas Meditações de Descartes
Espaço Social Da Dúvida
An Overview of Skeptical Worries
Why Wittgenstein Doesn’t Refute Skepticism
Sobre a maneira neopirrônica de agir e pensar
Internismo sem intelectualismo e sem reflexividade
Knowing (How It Is) That P
Austinian Themes
Language, World, and Limits
On Evidence in Philosophy
Truth, Fiction, and Literature
Scepticism comes alive
The Cambridge History of Philosophy, 1945–2015
Truth and Human Nature
Epistemology
Mathematics for Humans
Where There's a Will There's a Way
Direct Perceptual Realism II
Manifest Realism II
Direct Perceptual Realism I
Moore
What Knowledge Is and What It Ought to Be
Manifest Realism I
How Do We Know Necessary Truths?
The Problem of Relativism in the Sociology of (Scientific) Knowledge
Knowledge and Lotteries
Extending Ourselves
How to Be a Pyrrhonist
Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification
Second philosophy
Kant, Science, and Human Nature
Sceptical hypotheses and subjective indistinguishability
Fish traps and rabbit snares
Against meta-skepticism
Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought and Reality
Skepticism and Virtue Epistemology
Educating for Virtuous Intellectual Character and Valuing Truth
Rehabilitating Transcendental Arguments
Epistemic magnetism
Thomas Reid, Common Sense, and Pragmatism
Is Radical Doubt Morally Wrong
Taking Skepticism Seriously
Con‐ditions of sense
Dreams and Paintings
Introduction to the special issue
Reply to Gardiner and DiPaolo
Disentangling Cartesian Global Skepticism from Cartesian Problematic External-World Idealism in Kant’s Refutation
A meaning holistic (dis)solution of subject–object dualism – its implications for the human sciences
Epistemic Exclusion
Moore against the sceptics
Rorty, Williams, and Davidson
Knowing that there is no demon
What Descartes' Demon Can Do and his Dream Cannot
Locke on Sensitive Knowledge as Knowledge 1
Closure, Underdetermination and the peculiarity of Sceptical scenarios
Experience
Linguistic Phenomenology
Doubt, Circularity and the Moorean Response to the Sceptic
Moorean Facts and Belief Revision, or Can the Skeptic Win
Pluralistic Skepticism
The Reaches of Words∗
Real Fakes
The Moral Closure Argument
The Uses of Sense
Contextualism and the Problem of the External World
Meta‐Skepticism
Replies to Leite, Turri, and Gerken
Scepticism and its Sources
The Radicalism of Truth‐insensitive Epistemology
The Value of Perception
A‐Rational Epistemological Disjunctivism
Pragmatic Skepticism
Epistemic Angst
Stroud's Camap
Dogmatism, Underminers and Skepticism
A new problem for rules
Aspect and Ascription in the Music of Mathias Spahlinger
Against the conditional correctness of scepticism
Beyond the ‘French Fries and the Frankfurter’
Evidentialism and skeptical arguments
Epistemology Factualized
The paradigm response to skepticism
Evidence of factive norms of belief and decision
Natural Doubts
Duhem–Quine virtue epistemology
The Evil Demon argument as based on closure plus meta-coherence
The insignificance of philosophical skepticism
The Knower Paradox and Epistemic Closure
Kant on justification in transcendental philosophy
Kant and the forms of realism
Contextualism and fallibility
The Self-Knowledge Gambit
Wittgenstein and the groundlessness of our believing
Contextualism And Global Doubts About The World
Sceptical possibilities? No worries
| Obras citantes distintas | 122 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3,05 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1986 - 2026 (41) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | Sí |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 109 |