The UK's Reserve Forces

Retrospect and Prospect

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2340786
AutoresChristopher Dandeker (King's College London, autor de correspondencia), Neil Greenberg (0000-0003-4550-2971, King's College London), Geoffrey Orme (The University of Adelaide), Geoffrey J Orme (The University of Adelaide)
Año2011
Volumen37
Número2
Páginas341-360
Fecha de publicación2011-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaArmed Forces & Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0095-327X • E-ISSN: 1556-0848
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0095327x11398332
OpenAlexW2118496120
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas11
Referencias citadas6

This article focuses on how the role and structure of the UK's Reserve Forces have changed since their foundation before the First World War, with particular attention paid to the last two decades, during which time government has sought to make the Reserves more useable and relevant to post-Cold War military missions, including changing the legislative and administrative basis of their use. Since 9/11, Reserves have played an important role in the defense of the United Kingdom, particularly in operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, but the recent financial crisis has spurred further consideration of how best to structure and use this capability, which has been included as part of the recent Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR). The article analyses the current debate on whether the number of Reserve Forces should be cut or increased, and on how best to integrate their efforts with those of the Regular Forces. It also considers the evidence on the recent operational experience of Reserve Forces and its impact on a number of personnel issues, including recruitment, retention, and their health and well-being. The differences between the health and well-being outcomes for Reserve and Regular Forces are discussed and future lines of research enquiry highlighted, while the implications for the comparative analysis of Reserve Forces are also drawn out

Economics · Exit strategy · Government (linguistics) · Legislature · Management · Political science · Health and Conflict Studies · Law · Occupational Health and Performance · Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research · Public Administration