The Use of Geophysical Survey in Archaeology
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 23734841 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Timothy J Horsley (Yale University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2015 |
| Páginas | 1-17 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2015-05-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | OTHER |
| Revista | Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0356 |
| OpenAlex | W1539513995 |
| ISBN | 9781118900772 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 55 |
This essay aims to introduce readers to geophysical methods that are currently employed to help archaeologists study the past. Geophysical techniques exploit differences between the physical properties of buried remains and the natural soil to allow their detection and characterization without—or in advance of—digging. When successfully applied, they have the potential to dramatically enhance archaeological investigations by providing a map of buried remains that can (i) help to assess an area for its archaeological potential; (ii) guide subsequent excavation; or (iii) be used as a tool to define and test research questions in their own right. Given the relatively rapid and noninvasive nature of these methods, it is possible to examine entire sites and landscapes, in some instances detecting features as small as individual post holes. While these techniques are routinely integrated into archaeological investigations in some parts of the world, their potential in many areas is only starting to be realized. It is expected that we will see continued growth in the number of surveys being conducted, as well as in the sizes of areas encompassed and in the range of their archaeological application. This essay will briefly introduce the major geophysical techniques and types of buried features that may be detected. Recent developments in various aspects of the discipline are then summarized, before discussing ways in which the results may be applied more broadly in future archaeological and anthropological investigations.
Archaeology · Digging · Excavation · Exploit · Geography · Natural (archaeology) · Computer Science · Earthquake Detection and Analysis · Geology · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Geophysics
Geophysical Methods of Archaeological Site Surveying
Seeing Beneath the Soil
GPR Remote Sensing in Archaeology
Initial results using GPS navigation with the Foerster magnetometer system at the World Heritage site of Cyrene, Libya
Detecting Trends in the Prediction of the Buried Past
A review of the role of magnetic susceptibility in archaeogeophysical studies in the USA
Situating Remote Sensing in Anthropological Archaeology
Correcting for topography and the tilt of ground‐penetrating radar antennae
Geovisualization
Geophysical Prospection in the Southern Harz Mountains, Germany
Investigation of a Bronze Age plankway by spectral induced polarization
GPR time slices in archaeological prospection
The STREAM X Multichannel GPR System
Recent results from the English Heritage caesium magnetometer system in comparison with recent fluxgate gradiometers
The Schlumberger array—potential and pitfalls in archaeological prospection
Prospecting for New Questions
Rapid and sensitive magnetometer surveys of large areas using SQUIDs – the measurement system and its application to the Niederzimmern Neolithic double‐ring ditch exploration
Electromagnetic conductivity mapping for site prediction in meandering river floodplains
Large‐scale systematic fluxgate gradiometry at the roman city of Wroxeter
Raster was Yesterday
Application of seismic refraction to archaeological prospecting
Integrating multidimensional geophysical data
Mapping the ancient port at the archaeological site of Itanos (Greece) using shallow seismic methods
Beneath the sand—remote sensing, archaeology, aggregates and sustainability
Detection of resistive features using towed slingram electromagnetic induction instruments
A superconducting quantum interference device system for geomagnetic archaeometry
Experiments with the square array
Fluxgate gradiometry and square array resistance survey at Drumlanrig, Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
Resistivity and magnetics of the Roman town Carnuntum, Austria
Evaluating the multiple coil configurations of the EM38DD and Dualem‐21S sensors to detect archaeological anomalies
Efficient, large‐scale archaeological prospection using a true three‐dimensional ground‐penetrating Radar Array system
Geophysical Archaeology Research Agendas for the Future
The Use of Electromagnetic Induction in Locating Graves and Mapping Cemeteries
Large-scale systematic fluxgate gradiometry at the roman city of Wroxeter
Ground‐penetrating radar
Application of the self‐potential method to archaeological prospection
Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology
Geophysical Survey at Boden Vean, Cornwall, Including an Assessment of the Microgravity Technique for the Location of Suspected Archaeological Void Features
Completion of the Seismic Refraction Survey to Locate the Vallum at Vindobala, Hadrian's Wall
Earth Resistance for Archaeologists
A rival to Stonehenge? Geophysical survey at Stanton Drew, England
Shifting Communities
Geophysical Surveys as Landscape Archaeology
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2016 - 2021 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |