Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Use of Geophysical Survey in Archaeology

Datos Bibliográficos

ID23734841
AutoresTimothy J Horsley (Yale University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2015
Páginas1-17
Fecha de publicación2015-05-15
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoOTHER
RevistaEmerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (JOURNAL)
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0356
OpenAlexW1539513995
ISBN9781118900772
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5
Referencias citadas55

This essay aims to introduce readers to geophysical methods that are currently employed to help archaeologists study the past. Geophysical techniques exploit differences between the physical properties of buried remains and the natural soil to allow their detection and characterization without—or in advance of—digging. When successfully applied, they have the potential to dramatically enhance archaeological investigations by providing a map of buried remains that can (i) help to assess an area for its archaeological potential; (ii) guide subsequent excavation; or (iii) be used as a tool to define and test research questions in their own right. Given the relatively rapid and noninvasive nature of these methods, it is possible to examine entire sites and landscapes, in some instances detecting features as small as individual post holes. While these techniques are routinely integrated into archaeological investigations in some parts of the world, their potential in many areas is only starting to be realized. It is expected that we will see continued growth in the number of surveys being conducted, as well as in the sizes of areas encompassed and in the range of their archaeological application. This essay will briefly introduce the major geophysical techniques and types of buried features that may be detected. Recent developments in various aspects of the discipline are then summarized, before discussing ways in which the results may be applied more broadly in future archaeological and anthropological investigations.

Archaeology · Digging · Excavation · Exploit · Geography · Natural (archaeology) · Computer Science · Earthquake Detection and Analysis · Geology · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Geophysics

  • Assessing site organization and development using geophysical prospection at Dayatou, Gansu, China

    Open Access•A Womack, Timothy J Horsley et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2019

  • Geophysical Detection and Assessment of Leveled Mounds

    Open Access•William Green, Adam S Wiewel et al.•American Antiquity•2021

  • Complex Pathways Towards Emergent Pastoral Settlements

    Open Access•Y Jaffe, Anke Hein et al.•Journal of World Prehistory•2021

  • Mapping Qijiaping

    A Womack, Y Jaffe et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•2017

  • Anthropological Archaeology in 2015

    Open Access•Sharyn Jones•American Anthropologist•2016

  • Geophysical Methods of Archaeological Site Surveying

    Open Access•John W Weymouth•Advances in Archaeological Method…•1986

  • Seeing Beneath the Soil

    Anthony Clark, Anthony E Clark•Seeing Beneath the Soil•1990

  • GPR Remote Sensing in Archaeology

    Open Access•Dean Goodman, Salvatore Piro•GPR Remote Sensing in Archaeology•2013

  • Initial results using GPS navigation with the Foerster magnetometer system at the World Heritage site of Cyrene, Libya

    Open Access•Chris Gaffney, Vincent Gaffney et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2008

  • Detecting Trends in the Prediction of the Buried Past

    Open Access•Chris Gaffney•Archaeometry•2008

  • A review of the role of magnetic susceptibility in archaeogeophysical studies in the USA

    Open Access•Rinita A Dalan•Archaeological Prospection•2008

  • Situating Remote Sensing in Anthropological Archaeology

    Open Access•Victor D Thompson, Philip J Arnold et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2011

  • Correcting for topography and the tilt of ground‐penetrating radar antennae

    Open Access•Dean Goodman, Yasushi Nishimura et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2006

  • Geovisualization

    Open Access•Margaret S Watters, M Watters•Archaeological Prospection•2006

  • Geophysical Prospection in the Southern Harz Mountains, Germany

    Open Access•Burkart Ullrich, Georg Kaufmann et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2011

  • Investigation of a Bronze Age plankway by spectral induced polarization

    Open Access•Norbert Schleifer, Andreas Weller et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2002

  • GPR time slices in archaeological prospection

    Open Access•Dean Goodman, Yasushi Nishimura et al.•Archaeological Prospection•1995

  • The STREAM X Multichannel GPR System

    Open Access•Alexandre Novo, Michel Dabas et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2012

  • Recent results from the English Heritage caesium magnetometer system in comparison with recent fluxgate gradiometers

    Open Access•Neil Linford, Paul Linford et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2007

  • The Schlumberger array—potential and pitfalls in archaeological prospection

    Open Access•A Aspinall, Chris Gaffney et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2001

  • Prospecting for New Questions

    Open Access•Timothy J Horsley, Timothy Horsley et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2014

  • Rapid and sensitive magnetometer surveys of large areas using SQUIDs – the measurement system and its application to the Niederzimmern Neolithic double‐ring ditch exploration

    Open Access•V Schultze, Linzen et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2008

  • Electromagnetic conductivity mapping for site prediction in meandering river floodplains

    Open Access•Lawrence B Conyers, Eileen G Ernenwein et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2008

  • Large‐scale systematic fluxgate gradiometry at the roman city of Wroxeter

    Open Access•Chris Gaffney, C F Gaffney et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2000

  • Raster was Yesterday

    Open Access•Armin Schmidt, Gocha R Tsetskhladze et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2013

  • Application of seismic refraction to archaeological prospecting

    Open Access•Susan Ovenden, S M Ovenden•Archaeological Prospection•1994

  • Integrating multidimensional geophysical data

    Open Access•Kenneth L Kvamme•Archaeological Prospection•2005

  • Mapping the ancient port at the archaeological site of Itanos (Greece) using shallow seismic methods

    Open Access•A Vafidis, Maria Manakou et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2003

  • Beneath the sand—remote sensing, archaeology, aggregates and sustainability

    Open Access•Dominic Powlesland, James Lyall et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2006

  • Detection of resistive features using towed slingram electromagnetic induction instruments

    Open Access•Julien Thiesson, Michel Dabas et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2009

  • A superconducting quantum interference device system for geomagnetic archaeometry

    Open Access•V Schultze, A Chwala et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2007

  • Experiments with the square array

    Open Access•A Aspinall, Mary K Saunders•Archaeological Prospection•2005

  • Fluxgate gradiometry and square array resistance survey at Drumlanrig, Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland

    Open Access•R Walker, Robin R Walker et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2005

  • Resistivity and magnetics of the Roman town Carnuntum, Austria

    Open Access•Wolfgang Neubauer, Alois Hinterleitner et al.•Archaeological Prospection•1997

  • Evaluating the multiple coil configurations of the EM38DD and Dualem‐21S sensors to detect archaeological anomalies

    Open Access•David Simpson, Marc Van Meirvenne et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2009

  • Efficient, large‐scale archaeological prospection using a true three‐dimensional ground‐penetrating Radar Array system

    Open Access•Immo Trinks, Bernth Johansson et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2010

  • Geophysical Archaeology Research Agendas for the Future

    Open Access•Lawrence B Conyers, Juerg Leckebusch•Archaeological Prospection•2010

  • The Use of Electromagnetic Induction in Locating Graves and Mapping Cemeteries

    Open Access•Daniel P Bigman•Archaeological Prospection•2012

  • Large-scale systematic fluxgate gradiometry at the roman city of Wroxeter

    Open Access•Chris Gaffney, C F Gaffney et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2000

  • Ground‐penetrating radar

    Open Access•Jürg Leckebusch•Archaeological Prospection•2003

  • Application of the self‐potential method to archaeological prospection

    Open Access•Mahmut G Drahor•Archaeological Prospection•2004

  • Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology

    Kate McKinley•Historical Archaeology•2007

  • Geophysical Survey at Boden Vean, Cornwall, Including an Assessment of the Microgravity Technique for the Location of Suspected Archaeological Void Features

    Open Access•Neil Linford, N T LINFORD•Archaeometry•1998

  • Completion of the Seismic Refraction Survey to Locate the Vallum at Vindobala, Hadrian's Wall

    Open Access•N R GOULTY, Alison Hudson et al.•Archaeometry•1994

  • Earth Resistance for Archaeologists

    Armin Schmidt•Geophysical Methods for Archaeology•2013

  • A rival to Stonehenge? Geophysical survey at Stanton Drew, England

    Open Access•Andrew David, Mark Cole et al.•Antiquity•2004

  • Shifting Communities

    Open Access•Casey R Barrier, Timothy J Horsley•American Antiquity•2014

  • Geophysical Surveys as Landscape Archaeology

    Open Access•Kenneth L Kvamme•American Antiquity•2003

Obras citantes distintas5
Citas por año0,5
Intervalo de citas2016 - 2021 (6)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae