Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Morality of Defensive Force

Datos Bibliográficos

ID23769600
AutoresJonathan Quong (0000-0003-4176-4106, Professor of Philosophy and Law, University of Southern California, autor de correspondencia)
Año2020
Fecha de publicación2020-03-17
Open AccessNo
TipoBOOK
RevistaMorality of Defensive Force (SOURCE_BOOK)
EditorialOxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/oso/9780198851103.001.0001
OpenAlexW3020590051
ISBN9780198851103
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas28
Referencias citadas41

This book provides an account of the central moral principles that regulate the permissible use of defensive force. The book argues that we cannot understand the morality of defensive force until we ask and answer deeper questions about how the use of defensive force fits with a more general account of justice and moral rights. In developing this view the book offers original accounts of liability, proportionality, and necessity. It also argues, contra the dominant view in the literature, that self-defence can sometimes be justified on the basis of an agent-relative prerogative to give greater weight to one’s own life and interests. The book also provides a novel conception of individual rights against harm. Unlike some, who believe that our rights against harm are fact-relative, Quong argues that our rights against being harmed by others must, in certain respects, be sensitive to the evidence that others can reasonably be expected to possess. The final chapter provides an extended defence of the means principle, a principle that prohibits harmfully using other persons’ bodies or other rightful property unless those persons are duty bound to permit this use or have otherwise waived their claims against such use.

Criminology · Morality · Political science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · Psychology · Torture, Ethics, and Law · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • The Ethics of Surveillance in Times of Emergency

    Open Access•Kevin Macnish, Adam Henschke•Ethics of Surveillance in Times…•2023

  • Proportional Immigration Enforcement

    Mollie Gerver, Patrick L Lown et al.•The Journal of Politics•2023

  • Police Obligations to Aggressors with Mental Illness

    Ben Jone, Ben Jones•The Journal of Politics•2024

  • Self-Defense Against Conditional Threats

    Open Access•Luciano Venezia, Eduardo Rivera‐López•The Journal of Ethics•2025

  • Influence Match

    Open Access•Francisco García Gibson•The Journal of Ethics•2025

  • ‘Defensive Escalations’

    Open Access•Gerald Lang•The Journal of Ethics•2022

  • The Problem with Preparing to Kill in Self‐Defense

    Open Access•Lee-Ann Chae•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2024

  • Why It Is Not Unreasonable to Fear Terrorism

    Open Access•Eran Fish•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2024

  • Rights

    Open Access•Joseph Bowen•Ratio•2025

  • External‐World Skepticism and the New Ethics of Belief

    Open Access•James Fritz•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2026

  • Two grounds of liability

    Open Access•Victor Tadros•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • Rights reclamation

    Open Access•William Bell•Philosophical Studies•2024

  • A unificationist approach to wrongful pure risking

    Open Access•Kritika Maheshwari•Inquiry•2024

  • Offsetting and Risk Imposition

    Christian Barry, Garrett Cullity•Ethics•2022

  • The Morality of Gossip

    Cecile Fabre•Ethics•2023

  • The Demands of Necessity

    David James Clark•Ethics•2023

  • The Ethics of Defunding the Police

    Open Access•Ben Jones, Désirée Lim•Perspectives on Politics•2025

  • Protect, serve, predict

    Open Access•Renée Jorgensen Bolinger•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2025

  • Striking and the means principle

    Open Access•James Christensen•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2025

  • Rescue and Necessity

    Open Access•Joel Joseph, Theron Pummer•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2023

  • Defensive Killing by Police

    Open Access•Jennifer M Page•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2023

  • In defense of no one

    Open Access•Joseph Bowen, James Goodrich et al.•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2025

  • Contrastive consent and secondary permissibility

    Open Access•Theron Pummer•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2022

  • Proportionality and Necessity in Israel’s Invasion of Gaza, 2023–2024

    Open Access•Jeff Mcmahan•Analyse & Kritik•2024

  • Defensive Desert

    Open Access•William Bell•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2026

  • Conceptual ethics and the ethics of implementation

    Open Access•Sebastian Köhler, Herman Veluwenkamp•Synthese•2025

  • Proportionality in the Aggregate

    Open Access•Elad Uzan•Philosophical Studies•2025

  • Immigration Ethics

    Open Access•David Clark, David J Clark et al.•Religions•2022

  • The Ethics of Killing

    Jeff Mcmahan•The ethics of killing•2002

  • Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection

    Frank Jackson•Ethics•1991

  • How Should We Aggregate Competing Claims?

    Alex Voorhoeve•Ethics•2014

  • The Basis of Moral Liability to Defensive Killing

    Open Access•Jeff Mcmahan•Philosophical Issues•2005

  • Rescuing Justice and Equality

    G A Cohen•Rescuing Justice and Equality•2008

  • What is Egalitarianism?

    Samuel Scheffler•John Rawls•2017

  • Sovereign Virtue

    Ronald Dworkin•Sovereign Virtue•2002

  • The Reciprocity Theory of Rights

    Open Access•David Rodin•Law and Philosophy•2014

  • Fairness and Self-Defense

    George Draper•Social Theory and Practice•1993

  • On what matters, Volume one

    Derek Parfit, Samuel Scheffler•On What Matters•2011

  • Intention, Permissibility, Terrorism, and War

    Open Access•Jeff Mcmahan•Philosophical Perspectives•2009

  • Debate

    Open Access•Uwe Steinhoff•Journal of Political Philosophy•2008

  • On Following Orders in an Unjust War

    Open Access•David Estlund•Journal of Political Philosophy•2007

  • The Toss‐Up Between a Profiting, Innocent Threat and His Victim

    Open Access•Susanne Burri•Journal of Political Philosophy•2014

  • Debate

    Open Access•Jeff Mcmahan•Journal of Political Philosophy•2008

  • Is Moral Obligation Objective or Subjective

    Open Access•Michael J Zimmerman•Utilitas•2006

  • What Makes a Person Liable to Defensive Harm

    Open Access•Kerah Gordon‐solmon•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2017

  • The Rejection of Consequentialism

    Samuel Scheffler•Rejection of Consequentialism•1984

  • Killing the Innocent in Self‐Defense

    Open Access•Michael Otsuka•Philosophy & Public Affairs•1994

  • Limited Aggregation and Risk

    Open Access•Seth Lazar•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2018

  • Terrorism and Intending Evil

    Open Access•F M Kamm•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2008

  • Necessity in Self‐Defense and War

    Open Access•Seth Lazar•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2012

  • Liability to Defensive Harm

    Open Access•Jonathan Quong•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2012

  • Aggregation, Complaints, and Risk

    Open Access•Joe Horton•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2017

  • Treating People as Tools

    Open Access•Ketan H Ramakrishnan•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2016

  • Saving Lives, Moral Theory, and the Claims of Individuals

    Open Access•Michael Otsuka•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2006

  • What We Owe to Hypocrites

    Open Access•Johann Frick•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2016

  • Wrongful Intentions without Closeness

    Open Access•Victor Tadros•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2015

Obras citantes distintas28
Citas por año5,6
Intervalo de citas2021 - 2026 (6)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 25
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae