Research Ethics Boards as Spaces of Marginalization

A Canadian Story

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2385209
AutoresDonna Patterson (University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada,)
Año2008
Volumen14
Número1
Páginas18-27
Fecha de publicación2008-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaQualitative Inquiry (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1077-8004 • E-ISSN: 1552-7565
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1077800407308915
OpenAlexW2080385200
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas9
Referencias citadas5

This article complicates how Canadian universities are pressured to capitalize on research and how these same pressures affect both the collaborative and community-based research within the academy by privileging one type of research and relationships within community over others. Through examining historical influences on Research Ethics Boards in Canada, ways these pressures shape qualitative research and disturb how and what we know, as well as what can be known about who and how we work move in and out of focus. Questions are raised about living ethically as qualitative researchers within an institutional context

Affect (linguistics · Context (archaeology · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Focus (optics · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Research ethics · Social science · Sociology · Ethics in Clinical Research · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics