Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Limits of Sociological Practice

On the Analytical Function of Sociology

Datos Bibliográficos

ID24020104
AutoresRubén Tamboleo García (0000-0003-1631-0815, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, autor de correspondencia)
Año2026
Volumen56
Número3
Fecha de publicación2026-07-31
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal for the Theory of Social Behaviour (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0021-8308 • E-ISSN: 1468-5914
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/jtsb.70059
OpenAlexW7171971803
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas10

This article examines whether sociologists have lost sight of the proper scope of the discipline from a functional perspective, arguing that many of the tensions surrounding sociology arise from expectations that exceed its analytical function. Contemporary sociology is often expected to provide immediate solutions, predict future developments or support ideological positions; however, these expectations push the discipline beyond its proper scope. Drawing on classical sociological insights from Durkheim, Weber, Merton and Parsons, and engaging directly with the critical–realist case against value‐neutrality, the article argues that sociology fulfils its role when it focuses on understanding social processes rather than attempting to engineer social change, forecast the future or act as political advocacy. It distinguishes objectivity, treated as a regulative horizon pursued but never fully possessed, from neutrality, redefined as a restraint of the analytical role rather than equidistance before the object, and develops the distinction through the worked example of suicide. It situates basic and applied sociology within a single analytical function, distinct from intervention and activism and documents through the case of social work how a discipline that declines to define its jurisdiction cedes ground to those that do. Recognising the structural limits of sociology does not weaken the discipline; these limits safeguard its analytical autonomy and secure the one jurisdiction that no rival is equipped to claim.

Autonomy · Function (biology) · Historical sociology · Ideology · Jurisdiction · Politics · Privilege (computing) · Scope (computer science) · Sociology of law · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Critical Realism in Sociology · Emile Durkheim and Sociology

  • Reconstructing Sociology

    Open Access•Douglas V Porpora•Reconstructing Sociology•2015

  • Twenty Lectures Sociological Theory Since World War II

    Jeffrey C Alexander•Twenty Lectures Sociological…•1987

  • For Public Sociology

    Open Access•M Burawoy•American Sociological Review•2005

  • The Rules of Sociological Method

    Open Access•Jean-Michel Berthelot, Emile Durkheim et al.•The Rules of Sociological Method•1982

  • Boundaries of Social Work or Social Work of Boundaries

    Andrew Abbott•Social Service Review•1995

  • Realist social theory

    Melanie S Archer, Margaret Scotford Archer•Realist Social Theory•1995

  • System of Professions

    Andrew Abbott•System of Professions•2014

Altamente citadoNo
Abrir DOI
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae