Who can you trust these days
Dealing with imposter participants during online recruitment and data collection
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2404326 |
|---|---|
| Autores | A Santinele Martino (0000-0002-2270-3482, University of Calgary, autor de correspondencia), Arielle Perrotta (0000-0001-6473-0908, University of Calgary), Brenna Mcgillion (University of Calgary), Brenna Janet Mcgillion |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 24 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 1291-1301 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Qualitative Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1468-7941 • E-ISSN: 1741-3109 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14687941231224591 |
| OpenAlex | W4391157828 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 21 |
| Referencias citadas | 14 |
The use of digital technologies in qualitative research has been found to increase access and participation by minimizing geographical, scheduling, and financial barriers. However, discussions among the qualitative research community about the challenges of conducting research online and, specifically, what steps can be taken to mitigate 'imposter participants' remain limited. Anchored in a critical disability studies perspective, in this field note paper, we discuss lessons learned in conducting online qualitative research and preserving data trustworthiness
Data collection · Social science · Sociology · Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare · Applied Psychology · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Psychology
The price of stories
Perceived barriers and pathways to religious inclusion
Pragmatic and ethical challenges in navigating inauthentic participation in remote qualitative research
Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research
Remote interviewing, accessibility, and scams
Do participants lie? Imposter participants in online qualitative research
Participants or pretenders? Addressing the challenge of inauthentic participation encountered during three social research studies on experiences of food insecurity in the UK
Lessons Learnt
Re‐Thinking the Imposter Participant
Committing (to) Digital Sociology
Navigating the Rise of Artificial Intelligence and Imposter Participants in Qualitative Health Research
Authenticity in Question
Ethical and methodological implications of social media for participant recruitment
Imposter Participants in Synchronous Qualitative Research
Recruitment Strategies to Prevent Fraudulent Virtual Enrollment While Respecting Privacy in Vulnerable Populations
Data or Deception
The Problem with Rapport in Interview-Based Studies
Detecting and Preventing Imposter Participants
Moving Beyond Red Flags for Imposter Participants
Imposter Participants? Towards a Reflexive Epistemology of 'Suspected Participants
Imposter Participants
Threats of Bots and Other Bad Actors to Data Quality Following Research Participant Recruitment Through Social Media
Ensuring survey research data integrity in the era of internet bots
‘Imposter participants’ in online qualitative research, a new and increasing threat to data integrity
“Cherry Picking”
The ethics and implications of paying participants in qualitative research
Reporting disability in the age of austerity
Time Harms
Fear of the Disability Con
What Affects People's Willingness to Participate in Qualitative Research? An Experimental Comparison of Five Incentives
MTurk Character Misrepresentation
| Obras citantes distintas | 21 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 10,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 21 |