Testing the Validity of Gender Ideology Items by Implementing Probing Questions in Web Surveys
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2407428 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Dorothée Behr (0000-0002-2653-0531, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, autor de correspondencia), Michael Brauns (0000-0002-4551-6882, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences), Michael Braun (0000-0003-2680-6224, GESIS–Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany), Lars Kaczmirek (0000-0003-4868-2541, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences), Wolfgang Bandilla (GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) |
| Año | 2013 |
| Volumen | 25 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 124-141 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2013-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | CAM (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1087-8513 • E-ISSN: 1552-3969 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1525822x12462525 |
| OpenAlex | W2134421566 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 17 |
| Referencias citadas | 19 |
This article examines the use of probing techniques in web surveys to identify validity problems of items. Conventional cognitive interviewing is usually based on small sample sizes and thus precludes quantifying the findings in a meaningful way or testing small or special subpopulations characterized by their response behavior. This article investigates probing in web surveys as a supplementary way to look at item validity. Data come from a web survey in which respondents were asked to give reasons for selecting a response category for a closed question. The web study was conducted in Germany, with respondents drawn from online panels ( n = 1,023). The usefulness of the proposed approach is shown by revealing validity problems with a gender ideology item
Cognition · Cognitive interview · Data science · Developmental psychology · Ideology · Interview · Item response theory · Political science · Politics · Psychometrics · Sample (material · Sociology · Web survey · World Wide Web · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Improving measurements by survey infrastructures synergies
Assessing conceptual comparability of single-item survey instruments with a mixed-methods approach
Measures of gender role attitudes under revision
Insights into sustainability
Assessing Cross-National Equivalence of Measures of Xenophobia
Automatic Classification of Open-Ended Questions
Asking Probing Questions in Web Surveys
Question Order Effects in Cross-Cultural Web Probing
Probing in online mixed-device surveys
A Critical Examination of the Reliability and Validity of a Gender Role Attitude Scale in Flanders (Belgium)
What does the general national pride item measure? Insights from web probing
The intricate geographies of gender ideologies in Germany
Attitudes Towards Gender Roles in Cross-Cultural Surveys
Tackling Traditional
The Effects of Open-Ended Probes on Closed Survey Questions in Web Surveys
Do men and women really have different gender role attitudes? Experimental insight on gender-specific attitudes toward paid and unpaid work in Germany
Structural stability, quantitative change
Design, Evaluation, and Analysis of Questionnaires for Survey Research
Cognitive Interviewing
A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature
Analysing patriarchy capitalism and women's employment in Europe
Random Probes of GSS Questions
The Length of Responses to Open-Ended Questions
Asking Probing Questions in Web Surveys
The Influence of Topic Interest and Interactive Probing on Responses to Open-Ended Questions in Web Surveys
Evaluation of Cognitive Interviewing Techniques
Using Egalitarian Items to Measure Men’s and Women’s Family Roles
Open-Ended Questions in Web Surveys
Research Synthesis
Sources of Error in Cognitive Interviews
Research Synthesis
Survey Research
The Random Probe
Respondent Debriefings Conducted by Experts
| Obras citantes distintas | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,21 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2012 - 2026 (15) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 17 |