Comparing Food Label Experiments Using Samples from Web Panels versus Mall Intercepts

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2407481
AutoresLinchiat Chang (LinChiat Chang Consulting, LLC, San Francisco, CA, USA, autor de correspondencia), Chung-Tung Jordan Lin (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA), Chung‐tung Jordan Lin (United States Food and Drug Administration)
Año2015
Volumen27
Número2
Páginas182-198
Fecha de publicación2015-05-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaCAM (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1087-8513 • E-ISSN: 1552-3969
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1525822x14548395
OpenAlexW2097959060
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas19

To regulate health messages on food labels, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) traditionally relied on mall intercepts to collect consumer data. In recent years, web surveys have presented a viable alternative for presenting visual stimuli with more control and efficiency in data collection. However, there is a paucity of empirical data that compares mall intercept versus web panel samples to inform the relative merits and weaknesses of each sample source and their corresponding impact on study outcomes. We analyzed an FDA experiment deployed concurrently on a sample of consumers intercepted at shopping malls and a sample of consumers recruited by a web panel. Despite sample differences in demographics, topic knowledge, and time spent on survey, results from the core experiment were the same, that is, both samples yielded the same conclusions about the effects of the food label statements on consumer perceptions and intentions

Advertising · Business · Data collection · Demographics · Environmental health · Food and drug administration · Sample (material) · Shopping mall · Statistics · Web survey · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Marketing · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Smoking Behavior and Cessation