Community-Led Research Priority Setting for Highly Vulnerable Communities
Adaptation of the Research Prioritization by Affected Communities Protocol
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2410941 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Molly R Altman (0000-0002-0453-0469), Jane Paik Kim (0000-0002-1475-9822), Jane Kim, Morgan Busse, Ira Kantrowitz-Gordon (0000-0002-8531-6965) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 19 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Journal of Qualitative Methods (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1609-4069 • E-ISSN: 1609-4069 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1609406920957508 |
| OpenAlex | W3088207338 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 11 |
While community engagement can occur at all levels of research development, implementation, and dissemination, there is a great need for participation from those with lived experience in the development of research priorities to be used by stakeholders in research, funding, and policy. The Research Prioritization by Affected Communities (RPAC) protocol has successfully developed community-driven priorities for those at risk for preterm birth, but the 2-day focus group methodology may not be suitable for all vulnerable communities. For the purposes of a larger study supporting pregnant and parenting individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) in research prioritization, we adapted the RPAC protocol to meet the needs of this highly stigmatized community. This adaptation made it possible for those who may not have been able to attend two separate sessions to successfully engage in this participatory process and produce a completed set of priorities by the end of 1 day. The objective of this article is to validate the adapted protocol for prioritizing research and service delivery needs with vulnerable and stigmatized communities
Adaptation (eye · Alternative medicine · Business · Community engagement · Community-based participatory research · Focus group · Participatory action research · Political science · Prioritization · Process management · Protocol (science · Public relations · Sociology · Health Policy Implementation Science · Infant Development and Preterm Care · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology · Marketing
Comparing two sampling methods to engage hard-to-reach communities in research priority setting
Research Article: Recruitment of hard-to-reach population subgroups via adaptations of the snowball sampling strategy
Reaching the hard-to-reach
Inclusion of Marginalized Groups and Communities in Global Health Research Priority-Setting
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,75 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |