Why some cities feel inclusive
The city ethos model of institutions and population-rootedness in European cities
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 24142012 |
|---|---|
| Autores | PAZ YAACOV (Hebrew University of Jerusalem, autor de correspondencia), Dan Miodownik (0000-0003-3825-3911, Hebrew University of Jerusalem) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Volumen | 179 |
| Páginas | 107551 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Cities (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0264-2751 • E-ISSN: 1873-6084 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cities.2026.107551 |
| OpenAlex | W7154060891 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 34 |
How do cities sustain inclusive coexistence under conditions of diversity and demographic mobility? This article shifts the analytical focus to city-level inclusiveness , understood as a property of the city's institutional-normative order rather than of interpersonal relations. Building on a thin conception of city ethos, the article develops a City Ethos Model that conceptualizes perceived urban inclusiveness as an interpretive outcome shaped by the interaction between institutional perception and population-rootedness. The model treats population-rootedness as a temporal infrastructure that shapes how institutional performance is interpreted: where more residents have accumulated exposure to local institutions, institutional signals are more likely to settle into durable city-level expectations. Empirically, the analysis draws on approximately 108,000 respondents across 70 cities in 28 EU member states ( European Commission, 2019 , European Commission, 2023 ). Multilevel models show that positive institutional perceptions are associated with higher perceived inclusiveness. However, population-rootedness does not operate as an independent source of inclusion. Instead, it significantly moderates the institutional effect: in cities with greater population-rootedness, institutional perception is associated with higher perceived inclusiveness, whereas in contexts where institutions are viewed skeptically, rootedness may reinforce exclusionary interpretations. These findings suggest that population-rootedness functions as a conditional amplifier of institutional signals rather than as a direct driver of inclusion.
Credibility · Diversity (politics) · Ethos · Perception · Population · Property (philosophy) · Smart Cities and Technologies · Urban Planning and Governance · Urbanization and City Planning
Global Urban Justice
Exploring Inclusive Cities for Migrants in the UK and Sweden
Cities and plural understandings of human rights
The Essentials of Social Cohesion
Measuring quality of government in EU regions across space and time
Frontier Cities
A typology of local governments’ engagement with human rights
Place Attachment in Deprived Neighbourhoods
Will the true inclusive city rise? Mapping the strengths and weaknesses of the city ranking systems
The impact of neighbourhood and municipality characteristics on social cohesion in the Netherlands
Ethnic Diversity and Social Capital in Europe
Urban identity versus national identity in the global city
E Pluribus Unum
Localizing Human Rights
Does Diversity Erode Social Cohesion? Conceptual and Methodological Issues
Outcomes, Process, and Trust of Civil Servants
Organizing consent
The State and Social Capital
The Good City
City Branding and Social Inclusion in the Glocal City
The 'Right to the City
Theorizing the Politicizing City
Urban Citizenship and Right to the City
Ethnicity and the Multicultural City
Interactional Past and Potential
Ethnic Diversity and Its Effects on Social Cohesion
Urbanism as a Way of Life
The City
An Integrated Approach to the Conceptualisation and Measurement of Social Cohesion
Reconsidering Social Cohesion
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |