Understanding Sampling and Recruitment in Social Work Dissertation Research
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2501337 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Rebecca G Mirick (0000-0002-5191-6874, Salem State University, autor de correspondencia), Ashley Davis (0000-0003-3426-6096, Wheelock College), Stephanie P Wladkowski (0000-0003-4697-1139, Eastern Michigan University) |
| Año | 2017 |
| Volumen | 18 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 415-436 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2017-12-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Advances in Social Work (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1527-8565 • E-ISSN: 2331-4125 |
| Editorial | IU Indianapolis University Library (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.18060/21167 |
| OpenAlex | W2783097345 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 18 |
The field of social work has increasingly focused on improving the quantity and rigor of its research. For many social work doctoral students, their first independent research experience begins with their dissertation, and yet, little is known about the factors that facilitate students' success during this process. Sample recruitment is one step where significant and unexpected challenges can occur. As social justice is the central value of the profession, social work doctoral students may focus on research with vulnerable or marginalized populations; however, little research has been done that focuses on social work dissertations, samples used, and the process of recruitment. In this study, 215 doctoral-level social work graduates who completed their degree within the past ten years were surveyed about their dissertation research, with a focus on the sampling strategy and recruitment processes. Findings show that students have a wide diversity of experiences with the dissertation process. While 64.6% anticipant challenges around recruitment and sampling, only 54.9% encounter challenges. Less than half (44.7%) of study participants received guidance during this process and most (80.5%) felt the dissertation experience impacted subsequent research, both positively (40.5%) and negatively (9.8%). Based on these findings, doctoral programs are encouraged to increase supports available to dissertating students, particularly those recruiting study participants from vulnerable and marginalized populations. These supports include community connections, skills for obtaining gatekeeper buy-in, and both relational support and advice from dissertation committees and other colleagues
Focus group · Medical education · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions · Engineering · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice · Social Work
Sampling ‘Hard to Reach’ Populations in Qualitative Research
Beyond Infrastructural Issues
Enhancing Research Capacity and Knowledge Development through Social Work Doctoral Education
A National Content Analysis of PhD Program Objectives, Structures, and Curricula
The Evolution of Doctoral Social Work Education
Patterns and Trends of Canadian Social Work Doctoral Dissertations
The “New” DSW Is Here
How come I don’t get asked no questions?’ Researching ‘hard to reach’ children and teenagers
Challenges in recruiting parents to participate in child welfare research
Elite Knowledge or the Reproduction of the Knowledge of Privilege
Engaging parents in parenting programs
Social Work Dissertation Research
The Empirical Status of Social Work Dissertation Research
Culturally Competent Social Work Research
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Reaching and Engaging Hard-to-Reach Populations With a High Proportion of Nonassociative Members
African-Americans and Clinical Trials Research
Paying Project Participants
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |