Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Understanding Sampling and Recruitment in Social Work Dissertation Research

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2501337
AutoresRebecca G Mirick (0000-0002-5191-6874, Salem State University, autor de correspondencia), Ashley Davis (0000-0003-3426-6096, Wheelock College), Stephanie P Wladkowski (0000-0003-4697-1139, Eastern Michigan University)
Año2017
Volumen18
Número2
Páginas415-436
Fecha de publicación2017-12-17
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAdvances in Social Work (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1527-8565 • E-ISSN: 2331-4125
EditorialIU Indianapolis University Library (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.18060/21167
OpenAlexW2783097345
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas18

The field of social work has increasingly focused on improving the quantity and rigor of its research. For many social work doctoral students, their first independent research experience begins with their dissertation, and yet, little is known about the factors that facilitate students' success during this process. Sample recruitment is one step where significant and unexpected challenges can occur. As social justice is the central value of the profession, social work doctoral students may focus on research with vulnerable or marginalized populations; however, little research has been done that focuses on social work dissertations, samples used, and the process of recruitment. In this study, 215 doctoral-level social work graduates who completed their degree within the past ten years were surveyed about their dissertation research, with a focus on the sampling strategy and recruitment processes. Findings show that students have a wide diversity of experiences with the dissertation process. While 64.6% anticipant challenges around recruitment and sampling, only 54.9% encounter challenges. Less than half (44.7%) of study participants received guidance during this process and most (80.5%) felt the dissertation experience impacted subsequent research, both positively (40.5%) and negatively (9.8%). Based on these findings, doctoral programs are encouraged to increase supports available to dissertating students, particularly those recruiting study participants from vulnerable and marginalized populations. These supports include community connections, skills for obtaining gatekeeper buy-in, and both relational support and advice from dissertation committees and other colleagues

Focus group · Medical education · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions · Engineering · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice · Social Work

  • Reimagining Mentoring in Social Work Doctoral Programs

    Catalina Tang Yan, Linda S Sprague Martinez•Social Work Education•2026

  • Same Old Story or a New Chapter? Social Work Dissertation Research Revisited

    Open Access•Harly M Blumhagen, Brandy R Maynard et al.•Research on Social Work Practice•2026

  • Sampling ‘Hard to Reach’ Populations in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•L S Abrams•Qualitative Social Work•2010

  • Beyond Infrastructural Issues

    M O Howard•Social Work Research•2009

  • Enhancing Research Capacity and Knowledge Development through Social Work Doctoral Education

    Jeffrey M Jenson•Social Work Research•2008

  • A National Content Analysis of PhD Program Objectives, Structures, and Curricula

    James W Drisko, James Drisko et al.•Journal of Teaching in Social Work•2015

  • The Evolution of Doctoral Social Work Education

    Paul A Kurzman•Journal of Teaching in Social Work•2015

  • Patterns and Trends of Canadian Social Work Doctoral Dissertations

    D W Rothwell, Lucyana Lach et al.•Journal of Teaching in Social Work•2015

  • The “New” DSW Is Here

    Mery Diaz•Journal of Teaching in Social Work•2015

  • How come I don’t get asked no questions?’ Researching ‘hard to reach’ children and teenagers

    Open Access•Katherine J Curtis, Katherine Curtis et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2004

  • Challenges in recruiting parents to participate in child welfare research

    Open Access•Rebecca G Mirick•Child & Family Social Work•2014

  • Elite Knowledge or the Reproduction of the Knowledge of Privilege

    Open Access•Debora Ortega, Noël Busch-Armendariz•Affilia•2013

  • Engaging parents in parenting programs

    Open Access•Nick Axford, Minna Lehtonen et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2012

  • Social Work Dissertation Research

    Brandy R Maynard, Michael G Vaughn et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2014

  • The Empirical Status of Social Work Dissertation Research

    Brandy R Maynard, Michael G Vaughn et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2014

  • Culturally Competent Social Work Research

    Banghwa Lee Casado, Nalini Junko Negi et al.•Social Work•2012

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Reaching and Engaging Hard-to-Reach Populations With a High Proportion of Nonassociative Members

    Open Access•Sue Thompson, David Phillips•Qualitative Health Research•2007

  • African-Americans and Clinical Trials Research

    Open Access•Sharon E Moore, Wanda Lott Collins•Advances in Social Work•2002

  • Paying Project Participants

    Open Access•Lara Descartes, Marysol Asencio et al.•Advances in Social Work•2011

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año2
Intervalo de citas2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae