Symbolic animals and the developing self

This study examined developmental changes in animal symbols of the self, as revealed by identification with six animals (lion, eagle, bear, rabbit, lamb and cow) by children aged from 4 to 5 years (n=10), 10 to11 years (n=9), and 17 to 18 years (n=10). Overall, the eagle, rabbit and lion received positive identification scores, and the bear, lamb and cow received negative scores. Differences by age showed increases for the lion, eagle and bear, and decreases for the other three. Overall, boys positively identified with the lion and eagle, and rejected the rabbit, lamb and cow. Girls' average scores were positive only for the rabbit. Consideration of animal results by age and gender revealed important patterns, such as a middle age group gender split on rabbit identification. The data support two theories that explain motivations to identify or to dis-identify with symbolic animals. One theory holds that animals may pose a threat to society's symbolic regulation of behavior. This threat must be reduced by categorically distinguishing humans from animals. This theory was not supported in a strong or general form, but was supported in a weaker version that holds that specific animals are appropriated to symbolize individuals' role-specific social selves. The second theory holds that exploitation of animals generates a need for psychological defenses that shield the self from moral approbation or guilt. Thus, exploited animals cannot serve as symbols of the self and must be rigidly repudiated. This theory was supported also, but with data from a different sub-set of the animals. Both theories further articulate a social-developmental theory of how language, and symbolism influence human relations to animals, and help explain the origins of attitudes such as anthropocentrism. Implications for humane education are discussed

Animal welfare · Biology · Eagle · Identification (biology · Symbolic interactionism · Animal and Plant Science Education · Child and Animal Learning Development · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Psychology · Ecology · Social Psychology

• Factors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfare

  Open Access•James A Serpell, JA Serpell•Animal Welfare•2004

  Añadir item

• For goodness sake! What is intrinsic value and why should we care?

  Open Access•Chelsea Batavia, Michael Nelson et al.•Biological Conservation•2017

  Añadir item

• Evaluation of Factors Affecting Emotional Responses in Zoo Visitors and the Impact of Emotion on Conservation Mindedness

  David Powell, David M Powell et al.•Anthrozoös•2014

  Añadir item

• Dogs, Cats and Horses

  Marie Maurer, Fabienne Delfour et al.•Anthrozoös•2010

  Añadir item

• Public Attitudes in India and Australia toward Elephants in Zoos

  Vivek Gurusamy, Andrew Tribe et al.•Anthrozoös•2015

  Añadir item

• Mapping Human-Animal Interaction Studies

  Eduardo Barona Collado, Pedro Tomé Martins et al.•Anthrozoös•2023

  Añadir item

• Is the acquisition of social categories based on domain-specific competence or on knowledge transfer?

  Open Access•Lawrence A Hirschfeld•Mapping the Mind•1994

  Añadir item

• Course in General Linguistics

  Ferdinand De Saussure, Laura Key et al.•Course in General Linguistics•2017

  Añadir item

• Pigs for the Ancestors

  Roy A Rappaport•Pigs for the Ancestors•2000

  Añadir item

• The social construction of reality

  Peter L Luckmann Thomas A Berger, David Colacci et al.•The social construction of reality•1967

  Añadir item

• Meaning

  H P Grice•The Philosophical Review•1957

  Añadir item

• Psychological Mechanisms in the Human Use of Animals

  Open Access•Scott Plous•Journal of Social Issues•1993

  Añadir item