The Stylisation of Internet Life
Predictors of Internet Leisure Patterns Using Digital Inequality and Status Group Perspectives
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2642471 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Roderick Graham (0000-0001-6295-6620, City University of New York, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2008 |
| Volumen | 13 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 27-39 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2008-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Sociological Research Online (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1360-7804 • E-ISSN: 1360-7804 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5153/sro.1804 |
| OpenAlex | W2050780326 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 10 |
| Referencias citadas | 35 |
This research addresses the question: What are the predictors of internet leisure patterns? With the barriers to internet access receding the question can be asked: Whether or not social groups are beginning to distinguish themselves through different types of internet activities? This research will focus on the domain of internet leisure and entertainment within the United States population. Internet leisure is measured in this study by playing games, doing hobbies, reading, watching videos and listening to music. Predictors are drawn from a digital inequality and a Weberian status group perspective. Binary logistic regression models are run on a nationally representative survey from the Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project (N = 2013). This research suggests that: (1) both digital inequality and status group perspectives tend to work together to explain all internet activities, but a status group perspective provides more explanation for leisure patterns, (2) internet leisure is best conceptualised as a form of popular culture with minorities and people of low socioeconomic status consuming leisure at higher rates
Active listening · Digital divide · Entertainment · Inequality · Political science · Population · Social inequality · Socioeconomic status · Sociology · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Demography · Gender and Technology in Education · Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Digital Divide in Universities
Building a framework for theory-based ethnographies for studying intergenerational family food practices
The Third-Level Digital Divide
The digital divide shifts to differences in usage
The privilege of perversities
Leisure, inequalities, and the Global South
An exploratory study of digital skills of adult learners in Croatia
Is Social Status Related to Internet Pornography Use? Evidence from the Early 2000s in the United States
Digital Media Use
Connectivity in Later Life
Social Consequences of Internet Use
Technology and Social Inclusion
Social Movement Participation in the Digital Age
Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample
Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail
From Max Weber
Social Movement Networks Virtual and Real
Cultural (Re)production of digital inequality in a US community technology initiative
Loneliness and social uses of the Internet
Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences
Die Internet-Galaxie
Internet Access and Use in Context
Community Technology Centers
Gender and the Internet
Constructing Gender in Chat Groups
Digital Divide in Computer Access and Use Between Poor and Non-Poor Youth
Older Adults and Political Participation on the Internet
Tip of the Iceberg
Variable Geometries of Connection
Gender and the Internet
TV.com
A short-term longitudinal study of Internet and computer game use by adolescent boys and girls
Race, Place, and Information Technology
Class and Status
White Supremacists, Oppositional Culture and the World Wide Web
Social Differentiation in Musical Taste Patterns
Popular Culture and High Culture
The Income Digital Divide
Social Implications of the Internet
| Obras citantes distintas | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,67 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2011 - 2025 (15) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 8 |