Why the Georgist Movement Has Not Succeeded
Response to My Discussants
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2777073 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Warren J Samuels (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2003 |
| Volumen | 62 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 583-592 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2003-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | American Journal of Economics and Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0002-9246 • E-ISSN: 1536-7150 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1536-7150.00229 |
| OpenAlex | W2157386495 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
The article surveys factors external and internal to the Georgist movement that account for its relative lack of success. Key factors are the identification of income with productivity and the belief in a right to privatize economic rent. The Georgist defense of productive property thus was seen as an attack on property
Aesthetics · Art · Business · Citation · Economic growth · Economics · Identification (biology) · Library science · Microeconomics · Movement (music) · Natural resource economics · Productivity · Property (philosophy) · Property rights · Classics · Computer Science · Economic Theory and Institutions · Economic Theory and Policy · Global Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics · History · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism · Russia and Soviet political economy
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,21 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2012 - 2026 (15) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |