Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Preference for rural living environment improvement initiatives in China

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2798998
AutoresZhaohui Zhang (0000-0001-5376-5814, College of Economics and Management Shihezi University Shihezi China), Krishna Prasad Paudel (0000-0002-9780-5520, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness Louisiana State University (LSU) and LSU Agricultural Center Baton Rouge Louisiana USA, autor de correspondencia), Kamal Upadhyaya (0000-0002-8148-8479, Department of Economics and Business Analytics University of New Haven New Haven Connecticut USA, autor de correspondencia)
Año2023
Volumen82
Número1
Páginas61-78
Fecha de publicación2023-01-01
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAmerican Journal of Economics and Sociology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0002-9246 • E-ISSN: 1536-7150
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ajes.12490
OpenAlexW4312124872
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5
Referencias citadas38

The Chinese government has launched the Rural Living Environment Improvement Initiative (RLEII) to solve the poor living conditions in rural areas. The initiative enhances rural greenery; provides sanitary toilets; and promotes proper disposal of animal manure, sewage, and household waste in rural areas. We collected data using in-person interviews with 938 rural residents in Xinjiang, China, to elicit their preference, preference intensity, and preference heterogeneity for RLEII. Results indicated that rural residents prefer to see shortcomings of the RLEII addressed. Rural greening construction is identified with the highest preference intensity. We also find significant heterogeneity in rural residents' preferences for each attribute of RLEII. The preference heterogeneity is rooted in the region's economic condition (poor vs. nonpoor region). It is essential to understand rural residents' choice for rural public goods supply and to respect their preference intensity, sequence, and heterogeneity for RLEII to enhance the implementation performance. We discuss the implications of these findings

Business · China · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Government (linguistics) · Political science · Preference · Public good · Rural area · Socioeconomics · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Urban Green Space and Health

  • Understanding policy preferences of farmers for rural human settlements improvement in ethnic areas

    Shuqin Li, Jingmei Li et al.•Local Environment•2026

  • Community Leadership and Its Contribution to Rural Revitalization Under the Context of Population Hollowing‐Out

    Open Access•Pingyang Liu, Aixi Han et al.•Population Space and Place•2024

  • An Integrated Analysis of Residents’ Preferences on Ecological Governance in Yarkant River Basin, China

    Zhaohui Zhang, Quan Zhou et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2025

  • Aesthetic Governance and China's Rural Toilet Revolution

    Open Access•Xi Lan, Hok Bun Ku et al.•Development and Change•2024

  • How Does Community Leadership Contribute to Rural Environmental Governance? Evidence from Shanghai Villages

    Open Access•Pingyang Liu, Aixi Han•Rural Sociology•2023

  • Fitting Mixed Logit Models by Using Maximum Simulated Likelihood

    Open Access•Arne R Hole•The Stata Journal: Promoting…•2007

  • Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions

    Open Access•Gregory L Poe, Kelly L Giraud et al.•American Journal of Agricultural…•2005

  • Utility in Willingness to Pay Space

    Open Access•Riccardo Scarpa, Mara Thiene et al.•American Journal of Agricultural…•2008

  • Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values

    Open Access•Wiktor Adamowicz, Peter Boxall et al.•American Journal of Agricultural…•1998

  • Mixed logit estimation of willingness to pay distributions

    Open Access•Arne R Hole, Julie Riise Kolstad•Empirical Economics•2012

  • Assuring finite moments for willingness to pay in random coefficient models

    Open Access•Andrew Daly, Stephane Hess et al.•Transportation•2012

  • Divergence in stakeholders' preferences

    Open Access•Anna Nordén, Jessica Coria et al.•Ecological Economics•2017

  • Local community's preferences for accepting a forestry partnership contract to grow pulpwood in Indonesia

    Open Access•Dwiko Budi Permadi, Michael Burton et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2017

  • Agri-environmental policy valuation

    Open Access•Nele Lienhoop, Roland Brouwer et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Farmers’ perceived cost of land use restrictions

    Open Access•Sebastien Lizin, Steven Van Passel et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Evaluating determinants of rural Villagers’ engagement in conservation and waste management behaviors based on integrated conceptual framework of Pro-environmental behavior

    Open Access•Piyapong Janmaimool, Chaweewan Denpaiboon•Life Sciences Society and Policy•2016

Citas por año1,67
Intervalo de citas2023 - 2026 (4)
Altamente citadoNo

Herramientas

Abrir DOI
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae