Theories of Human Nature in Mencius and Shyuntzyy

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2809730
AutoresD C Lau (autor de correspondencia)
Año1953
Volumen15
Número3
Páginas541-565
Fecha de publicación1953-10-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaBulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0041-977X • E-ISSN: 1474-0699
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0041977x00111486
OpenAlexW2109086025
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7
Referencias citadas2

The problem of how human nature is constituted, we have good reason to believe, was current before Mencius and, from the time of Shyuntzyy onward, has been one of the central problems throughout the history of Chinese philosophy. The point at issue between Mencius and Shyuntzyy has traditionally been taken to be something like this. There is a thing called human nature, which is good according to Mencius, but bad according to Shyuntzyy. The same thing cannot be both good and bad at the same time, hence at least one of the two philosophers must be wrong. That this was how most thinkers of subsequent ages understood the position can be seen from the remedies they recommended. There were two ways of reconciling the conflicting views

Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Point (geometry) · Position (finance) · Chinese history and philosophy · Mathematics · Philosophy