Two Concepts in Early Chinese Military Thought
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2860842 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Benjamin E Wallacker, Benjamin Ε Wallacker (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1966 |
| Volumen | 42 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 295 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1966-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Language (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0097-8507 • E-ISSN: 1535-0665 |
| Editorial | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/411691 |
| OpenAlex | W2321566081 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
The terms chèng (1) and ch'í (11) present a perplexing problem for the reader or translator of texts in traditional Chinese military thought. In nonmilitary contexts chèng is rendered by a range of expressions including 'upright, true, orthodox, correct, regular, authorized, exact, straight, formal, just, at the time of, during, to adjust, principal, original, obverse', ch'í is translated 'strange, wonderful, rare'; the same graph read chī is translated ‘odd, single, surplus’
Cognitive science · Epistemology · Chinese history and philosophy · History · Military History and Strategy · Philosophy · Psychology
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,21 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2012 - 2017 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |