Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Interaction, Satisfaction, and the PCC

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3129219
AutoresAmy Rose Deal (0000-0002-7114-4103, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley, [email protected], autor de correspondencia)
Año2023
Volumen55
Número1
Páginas39-94
Fecha de publicación2023-12-22
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaLinguistic Inquiry (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0024-3892 • E-ISSN: 1530-9150
EditorialThe MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1162/ling_a_00455
OpenAlexW3216875806
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas29
Referencias citadas74

The Person-Case Constraint (PCC) is a family of restrictions on the relative person of the two objects of a ditransitive. PCC effects offer a testing ground for theories of Agree and of syntactic features, both those on nominals and those found on agreement probes. This article offers a new theory of PCC effects in an interaction/satisfaction theory of Agree (Deal 2015a) and shows the advantages of this framework in capturing PCC typology. On this model, probes are specified for interaction, determining which features will be copied to them, and for satisfaction, determining which features will cause probing to stop. Applied to the PCC, this theory (a) captures all four types of PCC effect recognized by Nevins (2007) under a unified notion of Agree; (b) captures the restriction of PCC effects to contexts of "Double Weakness" in many prominent examples (e.g., in Italian, Greek, and Basque, where PCC effects hold only when both objects are expressed with clitics); (c) naturally extends to PCC effects in syntactic environments without visible clitics or agreement for one or both objects, as well as to the absence of PCC effects in some languages with clitics or agreement for both objects. Two refinements of the interaction/ satisfaction theory are offered: a new notation for probes' interaction and satisfaction specifications, clarifying the absence of uninterpretable/unvalued features as drivers of Agree; and a proposal for the way that probes' behavior may change over the course of a derivation, dubbed dynamic interaction

Constraint (computer-aided design · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Notation · Syntax · Typology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · History · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · linguistics and terminology studies · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Invisible inanimates and the syntax of pronominal prefixes in Northern Iroquoian

    Open Access•Jessica Coon•Language•2026

  • United Cyclic Agree

    Open Access•Squid Tamar-Mattis•Proceedings of the Linguistic…•2024

  • Constraint-driven Agree

    Open Access•Elango Kumaran•Proceedings of the Linguistic…•2022

  • Timing-driven derivation of a NOM/ACC agreement pattern

    Open Access•Asia Pietraszko•Glossa a journal of general…•2023

  • First Conjunct Clitic Doubling, the Person Case Constraint, and First Conjunct Agreement

    Open Access•Lefteris Paparounas, Martin Salzmann•Glossa a journal of general…•2023

  • Control and intermediate scrambling

    Open Access•Eszter Ótott-Kovács•Glossa a journal of general…•2024

  • Being polite and subordinate

    Open Access•Satoshi Tomioka, Keita Ishii•Glossa a journal of general…•2022

  • A principled exception to the Müller-Takano Generalization

    Open Access•Stanislao Zompì•Glossa a journal of general…•2024

  • Satisfying the composite probe on the Topic head in Mandarin Chinese

    Open Access•Chao-Ting Tim Chou•Studia Linguistica•2025

  • Clause size, cross-clausal dependencies, and the left periphery

    Open Access•Peter Grishin•The Canadian Journal of…•2026

  • Probe Specification and Agreement Variation

    Will Oxford•Linguistic Inquiry•2024

  • The architecture of agreement

    Open Access•Diego Gabriel Krivochen, Douglas Saddy et al.•Frontiers in Language Sciences•2026

  • Quotative inversion as smuggling

    Open Access•John David Storment•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2026

  • On hyper-raising in Mandarin Chinese

    Open Access•C-T Tim Chou•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•2026

  • A new approach to plurals-of-politeness and their number agreement

    Open Access•Gurmeet Kaur, Yash Sinha•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2025

  • Omnivorous person, number and gender in Mundari

    Open Access•Gurujegan Murugesan, Imke Driemel et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2025

  • Anaphora and agreement in the Turkish DP

    Open Access•Lefteris Paparounas, Faruk Akkuş•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2024

  • Person effects in agreement with Icelandic low nominatives

    Open Access•Jutta Hartmann, Jutta M Hartmann et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2023

  • First conjunct clitic doubling in Modern Greek

    Open Access•Lefteris Paparounas, Martin Salzmann•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2024

  • The rise and fall of a person-case constraint in Breton

    Open Access•Milan Rezac•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2024

  • Mayan animacy hierarchy effects and the dynamics of Agree

    Open Access•Amy Rose Deal, Justin Royer•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2025

  • Raising and head-external relatives in Atchan

    Open Access•Rebecca Jarvis•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2025

  • Deconstructing SE-Constructions

    Javier Ormazabal, Juan Romero•Linguistic Inquiry•2024

  • Acknowledging the Gap While Bridging It

    Open Access•Zhuosi Luo•Cognitive Science•2025

  • Case-Dependent Agreement in an Active-Stative Language

    Open Access•Guillaume Thomas, Germino Duarte et al.•Languages•2025

  • What Formal Approaches to Syntactic Interfaces Can Tell Us about the Syntax of Preverbal and Prenominal Constituents in Galician

    Open Access•Timothy Michael Gupton, Brian Gravely•Languages•2024

  • Negative Concord without Agree

    Open Access•Imke Driemel, Johannes Hein et al.•Languages•2023

  • Omnivorous third person agreement in Algonquian

    Open Access•Peter Grishin•Glossa a journal of general…•2022

  • Agree and the subjects of specificational clauses

    Open Access•Susana Bejar, Arsalan Kahnemuyipour•Syntax•2023

  • The Polysynthesis Parameter

    Mark C Baker•The polysynthesis parameter•1996

  • Agreement and Its Failures

    Omer Preminger•Agreement and Its Failures•2014

  • The Syntax of Agreement and Concord

    Open Access•Mark C Baker•Syntax of Agreement and Concord•2008

  • Impossible Persons

    Daniel Harbour•Impossible Persons•2016

  • The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features

    David Pesetsky, Esther Torrego•Phrasal and Clausal Architecture•2007

  • Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste

    Open Access•Peter Lasersohn•Linguistics and Philosophy•2005

  • Deriving Variation from Grammar

    Arto Anttila•Variation, Change, and…•1997

  • Derivation by Phase

    Noam Chomsky•Ken Hale•2001

  • The Syntax‐Phonology Interface

    Open Access•Elisabeth Selkirk•The Handbook of Phonological Theory•2011

  • Agreement attraction in comprehension

    Open Access•Matthew W Wagers, Ellen Lau et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2009

  • Broken agreement

    Open Access•Kathryn Bock, Carol A Miller•Cognitive Psychology•1991

  • Person Licensing and the Derivation of PCC Effects

    Susana Bejar, Milan Rezac•Romance linguistics•2003

  • The Polysynthesis Parameter

    Jean-Pierre Koenig, Karin Michelson et al.•Language•1998

  • The clitic binding restriction revisited

    Isabelle Charnavel, Victoria Mateus et al.•The Linguistic Review•2015

  • Dissociating the Person Case Constraint from its “repair”

    Open Access•Tomohiro Yokoyama•The Canadian Journal of…•2019

  • Referential Hierarchy Effects in Yakkha Three-Participant Constructions

    Open Access•Diana Schackow•Linguistic Discovery•2012

  • Long Distance Agreement in Hindi-Urdu

    Open Access•Rajesh Bhatt•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2005

  • Taking case out of the Person-Case Constraint

    Open Access•Adrian Stegovec•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2020

  • The Person Case Constraint

    Open Access•Roumyana Pancheva, Maria Luisa Zubizarreta•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2018

  • Clitic doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface

    Open Access•Boris Harizanov•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2014

  • Cliticization feeds agreement

    Open Access•Neil Myler•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2017

  • The syntax of eccentric agreement

    Open Access•Milan Rezac•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2008

  • The Object Agreement Constraint

    Open Access•Javier Ormazabal, Juan Romero•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2007

  • The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects

    Open Access•Andrew Nevins•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2007

  • Multiple agree with clitics

    Open Access•Andrew Nevins•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2011

  • Raising, unphased

    Open Access•Claire Halpert•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2019

  • The Yimas Language of New Guinea

    Moira Yip, William A Foley•Language•1993

  • Masked Inversion in French

    Stephen A Marlett, Stephen Marlett et al.•Language•1991

  • Agreement in Natural Language

    Ur Shlonsky, Michael Barlow et al.•Language•1990

  • Argument Marking in Ditransitive Alignment Types

    Open Access•Martin Haspelmath•Linguistic Discovery•2005

  • Iconicity in Syntax

    John Haiman•Iconicity in Syntax (Typological…•1985

  • Person-Case effects in Tseltal

    Kirill Shklovsky•The Linguistic Review•2012

  • Spelling out clitics in Kambera

    Open Access•Marian Klamer•Linguistics•1997

  • Feature Gluttony

    Open Access•Jessica Coon, Stefan Keine•Linguistic Inquiry•2021

  • Cyclic Agree

    Susana Bejar, Milan Rezac•Linguistic Inquiry•2009

  • Phase Edge and Extraction

    Andrea Rackowski, Norvin Richards•Linguistic Inquiry•2005

  • The interpretation of the logophoric pronoun in Ewe

    Open Access•Hazel Pearson•Natural Language Semantics•2015

  • Extending the Person-Case Constraint to Gender

    Steven Foley, Maziar Toosarvandani•Linguistic Inquiry•2022

  • Cyclic Expansion in Agree

    Emily Clem•Linguistic Inquiry•2022

  • Breaking Agreements

    Omer Preminger•Linguistic Inquiry•2009

  • Movement from the Double Object Construction Is Not Fully Symmetrical

    Anders Holmberg, Michelle Sheehan et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2019

  • Syntax and Syncretisms of the Person Case Constraint

    Open Access•David Adger, Daniel Harbour•Syntax•2007

  • The Fine Structure of Cyclic Agree

    Open Access•Milan Rezac•Syntax•2003

  • Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax

    Maria-Luisa Rivero, David M Perlmutter•Language•1973

  • Revisiting Pronominal Typology

    Pritty Patel‐grosz, Pritty Patel-Grosz et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2017

  • Multiple Verb Movement in ≠ Hoan

    Chris Collins•Linguistic Inquiry•2002

  • Paucity, abundance, and the theory of number

    Open Access•Daniel Harbour•Language•2014

  • Mobile object markers in Moro

    Open Access•Peter Jenks, Sharon Rose•Language•2015

  • Amazonian Linguistics

    Daniel L Everett, Doris L Payne•Language•1991

  • Primary Objects, Secondary Objects, and Antidative

    Matthew S Dryer•Language•1986

  • Potawatomi Syntax

    Charles Hockett•Language•1939

  • Person Hierarchy and inverse voice in Kadiwéu

    Open Access•Maria Filomena Spatti Sandalo, Filomena Sandalo•LIAMES Línguas Indígenas Americanas•2010

  • Person and Number in Pronouns

    Open Access•Heidi Harley, Elizabeth Ritter•Language•2002

  • On the syntax of personal arguments

    Open Access•Valentina Bianchi•Lingua•2006

Obras citantes distintas29
Citas por año7,25
Intervalo de citas2022 - 2026 (5)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 28
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae