Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Scope of Mandatory Bargaining

A Critique and a Proposal

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3244232
AutoresDonna Sockell (autor de correspondencia)
Año1986
Volumen40
Número1
Páginas19
Fecha de publicación1986-10-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaIndustrial and Labor Relations Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0019-7939 • E-ISSN: 2162-271X
EditorialJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2523943
OpenAlexW4256098632
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas20

This paper argues that the mandatory-permissive distinction in the scope of the duty to bargain collectively should be abandoned in favor of a policy of classifying all lawful subjects as mandatory. The author shows that in recent applications of the distinction by the NLRB and the courts, many subjects of interest to labor have been declared within the exclusive control of management. She argues that the rationales used by the Board and the courts in these decisions are not compelling, and the mandatory-permissive distinction is even less convincing when its current application is compared to the criteria of an ideal scope of bargaining

Business · Control (management) · Duty · Economics · Ideal (ethics) · Law and economics · Management · Permissive · Political science · Programming language · Scope (computer science) · Computer Science · International Labor and Employment Law · Labor Movements and Unions · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Medicine

  • Legal responses to technological change in Canada

    Open Access•E G Fisher, James C Robb•New Technology Work and Employment•1989

  • Labor Standards in the United States and Canada

    Tequila Brooks, Tequila J Brooks et al.•Industrial and Labor Relations…•2004

  • The Mandatory-Permissive Distinction and Collective Bargaining Outcomes

    John Thomas Delaney, Donna Sockell•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1989

  • The Post-War Paradigm in American Labor Law

    Katherine Stone, Katherine Van Wezel Stone•The Yale Law Journal•1981

  • Conflicting Statutory Purposes

    Open Access•James A Gross•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1985

  • U.S. Industrial Relations 1950-1980

    Harold M Levinson, Jack Stieber et al.•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1983

  • Union Challenge to Management Control

    Richard A Lester, Neil W Chamberlain•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1948

  • The NLRA at Fifty

    Open Access•John Thomas Delaney, David Lewin et al.•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1985

  • Industrial Relations Performance, Economic Performance, and QWL Programs

    Open Access•Harry C Katz, Thomas A Kochan et al.•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1983

  • The Scope of Bargaining and Bargaining Outcomes in the Public Schools

    Stephen A Woodbury•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1985

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año0,11
Intervalo de citas1989 - 2004 (16)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae