How Might Positionality Be Used in Biblical Studies? Philippians 1
27-2:4 As an Example
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3261225 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Melissa C M Tan (0009-0005-3270-6408, University of Aberdeen, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 15 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 638 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-05-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Editorial | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel15060638 |
| OpenAlex | W4398252767 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 21 |
Using Philippians 1:27-2:4 as an example, this article will explore the role of positionality in biblical studies. Although the process of reflecting on one's positionality is more prevalent in empirical-based research, one's positionality is also relevant in text-based research, such as in biblical studies. This article will demonstrate this by observing the following: first, how some analyses of the collectivistic cultural context of Philippians have been inappropriately influenced by certain implicit individualistic perspectives; and second, how an interpretive lens derived from my positionality as a scholar from an explicitly collectivistic culture is able to highlight a mostly ignored intrinsic correlation between social relations and virtue
Art · Biblical studies · Literature · Sociology · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Development, Ethics, and Society · Historical and Linguistic Studies
The New Testament and Intellectual Humility
An Unnecessary KIS? The UK’s Key Information Set, was it Really needed and What was its Real Purpose?
Thinking Intersectionally
Philippians
Confucianism and Spiritual Traditions in Modern China and Beyond
An Introduction to Confucianism
The Face of God and the Etiquette of Eye-Contact
Reconceptualising Conversion
Collectivism and Individualism as Cultural Syndromes
Beyond the Land of Nod
Social Identity Map
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |