Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Perils of Feminist History

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3306350
AutoresRegina Markell Morantz (autor de correspondencia)
Año1974
Volumen4
Número4
Páginas649
Fecha de publicación1974-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0022-1953 • E-ISSN: 1530-9169
EditorialJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/202720
PMID11632267
OpenAlexW2325032172
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7

The Victorian period holds a particular fascination for the sympathetic historian of women's history. On the surface, at least, women were obviously oppressed by society's narrow definition of their role. Torn by the harsh realities of industrialization and the uncongenial atmosphere of Social Darwinism, nineteenth-century Americans sought refuge in a cult of domesticity which exalted Woman and Home. Woman's psychological and cultural burdens consequently became more onerous, even as her legal rights remained circumscribed. Her image was shot through with contradictions: Guardian of the race, yet wholly subject to male authority; preserver of civilization, religion, and culture, yet considered intellectually inferior; the primary socializer of her children, yet with no more real responsibility and dignity than a child herself Woman was inevitably tormented by the ambiguities of her position. In the wake of the renewed feminist consciousness of recent years, it is tempting to locate the source of twentieth-century problems in the apparent injustices of nineteenthl-century society. Many current feminist histories of the period do just that. One way or another each plays upon a single theme: Woman as Victim. The problem such works present for the historian are obvious: They are not history, but polemics. Fortunately, Ann Douglas Wood's treatment of the fashionable diseases manages to avoid the worst defects of recent feminist writing.' But it, too, suffers from a presentism which makes the author often too willing to distort historical evidence and lay blame, while missing a larger opportunity to explore the immense conplexities which lie at the root of Victorian attitudes toward women. The article is at its weakest in its discussion of two major points: nineteenth-century medical therapeutics in the treatment of women's diseases, and the attitudes and self-images of pioneering women doctors. Wood's handling of both

Political science · Sociology · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes

  • A Fertile Grounding

    Catherine A Warren•NWSA Journal•2000

  • Hysteria and its historiography

    Open Access•Mark S Micale•History of Psychiatry•1990

  • The rise and fall of decentralization

    Open Access•Michiel S De Vries•European Journal of Political…•2000

  • The History of American Medicine

    Ronald L Numbers•Reviews in American History•1982

  • Personalizing Illness and Modernity

    David G Schuster•Bulletin of the history of medicine•2005

  • Disease and Delinquency Know No Color”

    Open Access•Tanya Smith Brice•Affilia•2005

  • Emily Dickinson and the revenge of the nerves

    Joan Burbick•Women s Studies•1980

Obras citantes distintas7
Citas por año0,15
Intervalo de citas1980 - 2005 (26)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae