Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Class Struggle and the American Revolution

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3333464
AutoresRichard B Morris (autor de correspondencia)
Año1962
Volumen19
Número1
Páginas3
Fecha de publicación1962-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe William and Mary Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0043-5597 • E-ISSN: 1933-7698
EditorialJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1919955
OpenAlexW2326284659
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5

HE Richmond Enquirer of May io, i86i, commenting on a statement in a recent Washington Star to effect that General Winfield Scott, at age of seventy-six, true to principles of declared so-but whose principles of '76? Certainly not those of Virginia, or any one of 'old thirteen,' for they fought for right of self-government-a right which Gen. Scott denies, and is endeavoring to prevent exercise of, by sword. At age of 76, Gen. Scott is precisely where every American Tory was found in '76, on side of enemies of his own State and people. He is, indeed, true to Tory principles of '76. A century has elapsed since Fort Sumter, but nature of American Revolution is still unsettled. If, with Richmond Enquirer, we concede that American Revolution was a war for political independence, self-determination, and states' rights, we cannot summarily divest it of its nationalistic and centrifugal character. Similarly, granting its legalistic and constitutional base, we cannot so casually strip it of its egalitarian and democratic impulses. It is two hundred years since James Otis made his renowned writs of assistance speech, since day when John Adams, with perhaps pardonable exaggeration, declared the child Independence was born.' Two hundred years should have brought us perspective and some degree of objectivity toward venerable events. Certainly it seems appropriate that an age swept by political, social, and technological revolution should reexamine that fountainhead of modern revolutionary experience, American War for Independence, and test anew, on basis of most recent evidence, validity of hypotheses which varying schools of historiography have fashioned to explain this complex struggle. We have been enlightened by a variety of interpretations of American Revolution: Whig and Tory, national and imperial, Populist-Progres

Class (philosophy · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · American History and Culture · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · History · Race, History, and American Society

  • Revolution in the Quarterly? A Historiographical Analysis

    Michael A Mcdonnell, David Waldstreicher et al.•The William and Mary Quarterly•2017

  • Labor in the era of the American Revolution

    Hermann Wellenreuther•Labor History•1981

  • Clausewitz and the Fading Dialectic of War

    Open Access•Peter R Moody•World Politics•1979

  • The Navigation Acts revisited

    L Sawers•The Economic History Review•1992

  • La ' New Economie History

    Open Access•Maurice Lévy-Leboyer, Maurice Lévy–leboyer•Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales•1969

Obras citantes distintas5
Citas por año0,09
Intervalo de citas1969 - 2017 (49)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 5
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae