Eusebius of Caesarea's Representations of Christ, Constantine, and Rome

An 'Eschatology of Replacement

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3528293
AutoresMario Baghos (0000-0001-6322-4069, The University of Notre Dame Australia, autor de correspondencia)
Año2025
Volumen16
Número6
Páginas744
Fecha de publicación2025-06-09
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaReligions (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444
EditorialMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/rel16060744
OpenAlexW4411152430
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas16

The fourth-century historian Eusebius, bishop of Caesarea, lived during the anti-Christian persecutions of the Roman emperor Maximinus Daia and believed fervently that Jesus Christ would imminently return to alleviate the suffering of God's people. When Constantine the Great became emperor and converted to Christianity, the bishop's disposition towards the 'last things' or end times, known as eschatology, suddenly changed to a belief that God's kingdom had already been inaugurated in this emperor's reign. In this way, Eusebius conflated Church and Empire into a single organism governed by the emperor on behalf of Christ. This article demonstrates that this disposition in fact emerged from the bishop's problematic Christology. Heretofore, the concept of the Logos had been applied to Son of God as creator of the world and who assumed human nature as Jesus. However, Eusebius' disposition towards the Logos was subordinationist and dissociative, thus paving the way for him to depict the emperor as an agent of, and inhabited by, the Logos in the eschatological working out of earthly affairs from the vantage point of the city of Rome. Eusebius therefore essentially replaced Christ's eschatological agency in the usurpation of the Church by the eternal city that was ultimately recapitulated within Constantine himself, even after the latter had died

Art · Eschatology · Literature · Theology · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Historical and Linguistic Studies · Philosophy