Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

STEMinist sensibilities in the promotion of STEM and tech participation to women and girls

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3606419
AutoresAngela Bennette (Deakin University, autor de correspondencia), Kim Toffoletti (0000-0002-5672-9090, Deakin University)
Año2024
Volumen34
Número7
Páginas1-13
Fecha de publicación2024-08-04
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Gender Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0958-9236 • E-ISSN: 1465-3869
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09589236.2024.2385387
OpenAlexW4401308705
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas35

In recent years, organizations aiming to empower women and girls to participate in STEM have proliferated. While the issue of gender inequality in STEM is well documented, little is known about the feminist appeals these organizations make to girls. This study analyses the websites of five Australian ‘women in tech’ organizations to understand how they frame and respond to the problem of gender inequality, and what feminist sentiments they reflect. Combining a postfeminist sensibility (Gill, 2007) with Myers et al. (2019) concept of STEMinism, we propose a ‘STEMinist sensibility’ to interpret the ways in which gender issues and subjects are represented on STEM initiative websites. We identify four themes characterizing a STEMinist sensibility: 1) acknowledging the problem and promoting solutions to gender inequality, 2) a focus on tech girls as problem solvers, 3) cultivating community and connection for success, and 4) playing with girlification. We show how websites acknowledge the structural impediments women and girls face, yet simultaneously represent girls as both problematic and as problem-solvers in a way that renders them individually responsible for resolving the problems arising from gender inequality in their fields. These findings have implications for organizations promoting STEM initiatives to women and girls

High tech · Political science · Sociology · Career Development and Diversity · Gender and Technology in Education · Gender Studies · Law · Psychology · Youth Education and Societal Dynamics

  • Girlfriends and Postfeminist Sisterhood

    Open Access•Alison Winch•Girlfriends and Postfeminist…•2013

  • Girls and science

    Open Access•Jennie S Brotman, Felicia M Moore•Journal of Research in Science…•2008

  • Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics

    Open Access•Nilanjana Dasgupta, Jane G Stout•Policy Insights from the…•2014

  • ‘Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous’

    Louise Archer, John Dewitt et al.•Curriculum Studies•2013

  • The Status of Women in STEM in Higher Education

    Open Access•Heidi Blackburn•Science & Technology Libraries•2017

  • The can-do girl goes to coding camp

    Maureen Mauk, Rebekah Willett et al.•Learning Media and Technology•2020

  • STEM initiatives matter

    Elena Prieto, Kristina Sincock et al.•International Journal of Science…•2020

  • Geek Mythology

    Open Access•Jane Margolis, Allan Fisher et al.•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2003

  • Visual methodologies

    G Rose•Choice Reviews Online•2002

  • Future Girl

    Anita Harris•Future Girl•2004

  • Women Walking the Corporate Tightrope

    Open Access•Gretchen Webber, Patti Giuffre•Social Currents•2023

  • Not just a colour

    Open Access•Frazer Heritage•Visual Communication•2008

  • Postfeminist media culture

    Open Access•Rosalind Gill•European Journal of Cultural…•2007

  • Individualized femininity and feminist politics of choice

    Open Access•Budgeon•European Journal of Women s Studies•2015

  • A Multimodal Framework for Analyzing Websites as Cultural Expressions

    Open Access•L Pauwels•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2012

  • Confidence you can carry!’

    Sarah Banet-Weiser, Sarah Banet‐weiser•Continuum•2015

  • The absence of evidence of the effectiveness of Australian gender equity in STEM initiatives

    Open Access•Meghan Mckinnon•Australian Journal of Social Issues•2022

  • Whose STEM? Disrupting the Gender Crisis Within STEM

    Jessica A Heybach, Jessica Heybach et al.•Educational Studies•2017

  • Programs for Undergraduate Women in Science and Engineering

    Open Access•M F Fox, Gerhard Sonnert et al.•Gender & Society•2011

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Post‐feminism and popular culture

    A Mcrobbie•Feminist Media Studies•2004

  • A Tale of Two Majors

    Open Access•Sassler, Sharon Sassler et al.•Social Sciences•2017

  • Beyond Repudiation

    A Kanai•Australian Feminist Studies•2017

  • Empowered

    Sarah Banet-Weiser, Sarah Banet‐weiser•Empowered•2018

  • Women's underrepresentation in science

    Stephen J Ceci, W M Williams et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2009

  • STEMinism

    Kristen Myers, Courtney Gallaher et al.•Journal of Gender Studies•2019

  • Hack Along with Goldieblox

    Emily Blosser•Journal of Gender Studies•2023

  • Perceiving Glass Ceilings? Meritocratic versus Structural Explanations of Gender Inequality among Women in Science and Technology

    E A Cech, M Blair-Loy•Social Problems•2010

  • When I look in the bathroom mirror, I see all the women standing behind me

    Open Access•M Nash, Robyn Moore•Journal of Sociology•2021

  • Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies

    Open Access•Joan Acker•Gender & Society•1990

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae