Transfer of Power and the Crisis of Dalit Politics in India, 1945-47
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3607102 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sekhar Bandyopadhyay (0000-0003-2178-5268, Victoria University of Wellington, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2000 |
| Volumen | 34 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 893-942 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2000-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Modern Asian Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0026-749X • E-ISSN: 1469-8099 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0026749x00003875 |
| OpenAlex | W2156919339 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 15 |
Ever since its beginning, organized dalit politics under the leadership of Dr B. R. Ambedkar had been consistently moving away from the Indian National Congress and the Gandhian politics of integration. It was drifting towards an assertion of separate political identity of its own, which in the end was enshrined formally in the new constitution of the All India Scheduled Caste Federation, established in 1942. A textual discursive representation of this sense of alienation may be found in Ambedkar's book, What Congress and Gandhi Have Done to the Untouchables, published in 1945. Yet, within two years, in July 1947, we find Ambedkar accepting Congress nomination for a seat in the Constituent Assembly. A few months later he was inducted into the first Nehru Cabinet of free India, ostensibly on the basis of a recommendation from Gandhi himself. In January 1950, speaking at a general public meeting in Bombay, organized by the All India Scheduled Castes Federation, he advised the dalits to co-operate with the Congress and to think of their country first, before considering their sectarian interests. But then within a few months again, this alliance broke down over his differences with Congress stalwarts, who, among other things, refused to support him on the Hindu Code Bill. He resigned from the Cabinet in 1951 and in the subsequent general election in 1952, he was defeated in the Bombay parliamentary constituency by a political nonentity, whose only advantage was that he contested on a Congress ticket. Ambedkar's chief election agent, Kamalakant Chitre described this electoral debacle as nothing but a 'crisis
Alienation · Alliance · Cabinet (room · Caste · Constitution of India · General election · Hinduism · Legislative assembly · Nomination · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · History · Indian History and Philosophy · Law · Public Administration · Religious studies · South Asian Studies and Conflicts · South Asian Studies and Diaspora
A History of Prejudice
The Decline of the Caste Question
Can an Electoral System Ensure Real Representation? The Poona Pact and Preferable Dalit Representatives
Aryans versus Non-Aryans
Caste Politics and Partition in South Asian History
Ambedkarite Dalit movement and rise of socio-political consciousness among Dalits in colonial Gujarat
Criminalizing the Criminal Tribe
The Authoritarian Origins of Dominant Parties in Democracies
No matter how, Jogendranath had to be defeated’
Bound hand and foot and handed over to the caste Hindus’
Did the Poona Pact Disenfranchise the ‘Depressed Classes’? An Analysis of the 1936–1937 and 1945–1946 Provincial Elections
BJP’s Emergence and Struggles
B. R. Ambedkar on Caste, Democracy, and State Action
The Historiography of India's Partition
Civis Indianus sum'?Ambedkar on democracy and territory during linguistic reorganization (and partition)
| Obras citantes distintas | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,07 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2012 - 2025 (14) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 15 |