From broken windows to broken doors
Rethinking the Politics of Immigration Policing and the Sociology of Sanctuary
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3608487 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Michael Gould-Wartofsky, Michael A Gould-Wartofsky (Columbia University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 51 |
| Número | 19 |
| Páginas | 1-20 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-11-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | New Community (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0047-9586 • E-ISSN: 1469-9451 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1369183x.2024.2432432 |
| OpenAlex | W4404691892 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 38 |
The policing of extralegal immigrants and of citizens suspected of low-level offenses represent two of the most contentious issues in the contemporary urban context. To date, however, the nexus between the two has largely eluded scholarly attention, with conventional accounts of immigration enforcement tending to overlook the place of local police practices, in general, and of broken windows (or order maintenance) and what I call broken doors (or border maintenance) policing, in particular. This paper aims to address this epistemic deficit by comparing sanctuary and non-sanctuary jurisdictions within the same city-regions, against the backdrop of broken windows and broken doors. Drawing on an original analysis of declassified data, collected from jails, detention centers, and police precincts across Greater NYC and LA from 2002 to 2017, I assess whether agencies in adjacent jurisdictions exhibited substantively similar or dissimilar detention outcomes, measured in terms of per capita rates of detention and of detainees delivered to federal custody. Despite the formal divergence between sanctuary and non-sanctuary jurisdictions, this study finds a surprising, substantive convergence in local law enforcement agencies’ logics of practice, their repertoires of enforcement, and their operational outcomes, raising vexing questions for both scholars and practitioners of urban sanctuary
Criminology · Doors · Immigration · Immigration detention · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Engineering · Gender Studies · Law · Migration, Health and Trauma · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Sex work and related issues
Misdemeanorland
Legal Passing
Dividing Lines
Policing Immigrants
Discipline and Punish
Deported
The New Immigration Federalism
Sanctuary city policies and Latinx immigrant mental health in California
Enforcement, Integration, and the Future of Immigration Federalism
Policing immigrants or policing immigration? Understanding local law enforcement participation in immigration control
The expansion of “crimmigration,” mass detention, and deportation
Liberal Policies, Punitive Effects
Cities of Refuge
Legacies and Origins of the 1980s US-Central American Sanctuary Movement
Sanctuary Cities
Explaining variation in city sanctuary policies
Sanctuary Cities in Europe? A Policy Survey of Urban Policies in Support of Irregular Migrants
The “Local” Migration State
Sanctuary, firewalls, regularisation
The Politics of Refuge
How Interior Immigration Enforcement Affects Trust in Law Enforcement
A Multilayered Jurisdictional Patchwork
The Deportation Regime in the Sanctuary City
The Limits of Local Sanctuary Initiatives for Immigrants
The city in the age of Trumpism
Immigrant Sanctuary Policies and Crime-Reporting Behavior
Crimmigration at the Local Level
Rethinking the "Gold Standard" of Racial Profiling
Sanctuary city as mobilising metaphor
Abolitionist futures and the US sanctuary movement
Sanctuary Cities and Republican Liberty
Migrant "Illegality" and Deportability in Everyday Life
Between Public Service and Social Control
Do sanctuary policies increase crime? Contrary evidence from a county-level investigation in the United States
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |