How social movements can save democracy
Democratic Innovations From Below
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3691142 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Daniele Archibugi (0000-0001-9629-0353, Birkbeck, University of London, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 96 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 1668-1670 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-11-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ia/iiaa184 |
| OpenAlex | W3128564986 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 22 |
Social movements have often pioneered and advocated for human rights issues, and crucial contemporary advances in civil and political rights are fundamentally associated to their vision, struggle and determination. If we think about women, minority or LGTQ+ rights, progressive mobilization from below has anticipated, often by several decades, political institutions, even in representative democracies. However, social movements have the tendency to evaporate when their contingent political aims have been achieved, since they do not have the organizational strength of established institutions and associations. This book by Donatella della Porta, the leading authority on social movements research, channels her long-term research agenda into a particular direction. Namely, she asks to what extent have social movements actually contributed to innovations that were able to leave a permanent mark on political institutions. The book is informed by an underlying assumption, namely that representative democracy associated to capitalism is in crisis and that the people––those who ultimately should benefit from democratic practice––are increasingly unsatisfied with what is actually delivered. Specific events such as the 2008 great recession and, we may add, the 2020 COVID-19 crisis, have yet further increased this dissatisfaction. This seems to indicate that democratic practice is even less able to protect adequately the more vulnerable social groups in bad times. Decreasing electoral turnout, the rise of anti-system political parties and the growth of xenophobic tendencies indicate that citizens are no longer happy with traditional representative democracy––to the point that in a variety of nations the preservation of the democratic system seems to be at risk.
Capitalism · Civil society · Democracy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Social movement · Sociology · Turnout · Voting · Law · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Citizens in Distress
States vs. Social Movements
Bridging Activism and Party Politics
Legitimacy in the participants’ eyes
Activismo de base prefigurativo y futuros alternativos. Una propuesta de análisis
Control or participate? The Yellow Vests’ democratic aspirations through mixed methods analysis
Brexit as ‘politics of division
Emotional solidarity
Cities against democratic backsliding
Re-organizing for public value and reclaiming post-capitalist possibilities
A revolt of the distrustful? Political trust, political protest and the democratic deficit
Social movements and Europeanisation
Rethinking Social Rights as Social Property
Legalised resistance to autocratisation in common law Africa
Protesting power-sharing
How party polarisation exacerbates the link between democratic deficit and populist voting
Constitutional renewals
Contentious Institutionalization of Protests under Democracy
The dilemma of constitutional mobilization
(Re)organising Spontaneity
Realising direct democracy through representative democracy
Exploring the Communication of Social Movements in Primary Education
| Obras citantes distintas | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 5,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |