Globalization, international mobility and the liberal international order
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3697367 |
|---|---|
| Autores | John Money (0000-0003-2390-3125, autor de correspondencia), Jeannette Money |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 97 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 1559-1577 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-09-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ia/iiab118 |
| PMID | 34642576 |
| OpenAlex | W3198682791 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 7 |
| Referencias citadas | 4 |
Since the Second World War, globalization has been underpinned by a liberal international order, a rules-based system structured around the principles of economic interdependence, democracy, human rights and multilateralism. However, the relationship between international mobility and the liberal international order (LIO) is contested. In the article, I disaggregate 'international mobility' into three regimes: the travel regime, the voluntary (labour) migration regime, and the refugee regime-each governed by distinct norms and operating procedures. I outline the characteristics of the LIO that pertain to international mobility and provide evidence to demonstrate that none of the three dimensions of international mobility-travel, migration, and asylum-reflects these characteristics. Given the LIO principles enumerated above, the exclusion of international mobility from the LIO is surprising. I survey the scholarship on the LIO and international mobility and argue that the exclusion of international mobility from the LIO rests on benefits provided to core states by the status quo ante governing international mobility. That is, the status quo ante permits countries of destination to determine the level and type of cross-border mobility. Thus, international mobility continues to be underpinned by the play of state preferences rather than the principles of the LIO. The COVID-19 pandemic is likely to shape these norms and operating procedures in ways that reinforce the status quo
Development economics · Economics · Globalization · International relations · International trade · Multilateralism · Order (exchange) · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Status quo · Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration · Law · Migration and Labor Dynamics · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
From Liberal Order to Rules-Based Order
The EU Energy Transition in a Geopoliticizing World
Globalization, deglobalization and the liberal international order
Tracing paths of development of intercultural competence
Power, Mobility, and Space
A Virus That Knew Borders. Covid-19 Patients Zero Worldwide and the Strength of Transnationalism
End of jouissance, start of resentment
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,4 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 5 |