Racial Reconciliation
Can Religion Work Where Politics Has Failed
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3756738 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Patrick Glynn (George Washington University Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1998 |
| Volumen | 41 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 834-841 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1998-03-01 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | American Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0002764298041006005 |
| OpenAlex | W2094074504 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 6 |
The author argues that religious groups may offer the best hope for improving race relations in this country. The author contends that evangelical approaches to racial reconciliation have important advantages over secular approaches such as multiculturalism or conflict resolution theory. Importantly, the possibility of collective apology among religious groups, such as the Southern Baptist Convention, the National Association of Evangelicals, and the Promise Keepers, surpasses that of secular groups, particularly government, as the controversy surrounding President Clinton's proposed national apology to the Black community demonstrates
Conflict resolution · Convention · Criminology · Government (linguistics) · Multiculturalism · Political science · Race (biology) · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Gender Studies · Law
Is There a Right to Forget? Historical Injustices, Race, Memory, and Identity
Is the Multiracial Congregation an Answer to the Problem of Race? Comparative Perspectives from South Africa and the USA
Whose Promise Kept? Frame Construction within the Promise Keepers
The future of civilization and state religion policy
An Examination of the Effects of Residential and Church Integration on Racial Attitudes of Whites
Soft-Boiled Masculinity
| Citas por año | 0,22 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 1999 - 2010 (12) |
| Altamente citado | No |